On 3 January 2017 at 11:23, Paul Gilmartin <0000000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > Sometimes I sneer at z/OS for sidestepping the problem by shutting down > for the leap second and suggest that instead the TIME macro should return > hh:59:60 for the duration. But sometimes I succumb to reality:
TIME has options to return several other formats, including TOD-style time. What would it do with those, where the hh:59:60 representational notion doesn't work? Tony H. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
