>> And as for the "standard way" to cheat the Cobol table restriction (I'm no
-- Peter Hunkeler >> Cobol programmer, sorry): Cheating is cheating. Shudder.... But it explains >> at >> least why IBM agreed to change the code. Thanks. >> > >Not cheating, accomplishing a business need despite the compiler limitations. <important statement> No offence intended </important statement> You're right, it is not cheeting, it's worse. It's relying on undocumented behaviour. -- Peter Hunkeler ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
