when all else fails you may have to do them one at a time as the problems crop up
Sent from my iPhone Steve Beaver > On Feb 1, 2017, at 16:55, Pommier, Rex <rpomm...@sfgmembers.com> wrote: > > We're starting down that path. Management doesn't want to have to recompile > things but I'm thinking we may need to do so just to see if that's the > problem. > > Rex > > -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On > Behalf Of Steve Beaver > Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2017 4:54 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: COBOL/LE question > > I have a simple question do you happen to have a the source modules that if > you attempted to reassemble them and recompile them to see if that's the > problem > > Sent from my iPhone > Steve Beaver > > >> On Feb 1, 2017, at 16:41, Pommier, Rex <rpomm...@sfgmembers.com> wrote: >> >> Hello all, >> >> We are in the process of migrating from z/OS 1.13 to 2.2. We just ran into >> an issue with our COBOL and LE environment. We are running COBOL 4.2. >> Within the maintenance for COBOL and the upgrade in LE from 1.13 to 2.2, IBM >> introduced the warning message "IGZ0268W An invocation was made of OS/VS >> COBOL program XXXXXXX." along with providing a usermod that can be installed >> to suppress the message. Normally that is OK but we have an ancient load >> module written partially in OS/VS COBOL and partially in assembler that has >> a home-grown ESTAE routine attached to it. This program has consistently >> failed spectacularly while testing it under 2.2. Here's the sequence of >> events. >> >> 13.04.12 JOB01549 +TRBCYCLE: ESTAE ISSUED/LE COND HDLR REGISTERED >> <<<< 4 normal messages issued at start of run >> 13.04.12 JOB01549 +TRBCYCLE: BEGIN PROCESSING >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN