Thanks
-----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Charles Mills Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2017 10:39 AM To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu Subject: Re: QSAM using DCBE macro At its core, yes. CharlesSent from a mobile; please excuse the brevity. -------- Original message --------From: Steve Smith <sasd...@gmail.com> Date: 2/15/17 7:26 AM (GMT-08:00) To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: QSAM using DCBE macro Is this supposed to be a poem? sas On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 10:00 AM, Joseph Reichman <reichman...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi > > Previously I had asked if there were any advantages to using BSAM over > QSAM > > I was told there were very little > > And with a high price of coding complexity > > Now I wonder about using the DCBE macro > > With QSAM if there are any advantages I.E. > > Using the large block interface > > Would this mean that one QSAM "GET" > > Would read more data at one time into core > > Thanks > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send > email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > -- sas ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
