">No. IBM chose **not to break** thousands upon thousands of programs that were 
perfectly happy with 100 byte parm fields, provided via JCL.
> They added a new mechanism for those program, where 100 bytes was not 
> sufficient."



My reply was to Gil who was complaining about IBM's implementation of PARMDD 
(it should have been....). The "not to break" is a good thing.
Gil seems to think that breaking existing programs by introducing incompatable 
function is OK to do. I disagree.

I am in support of the path IBM chose.

-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Bill Woodger
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2017 9:46 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Question about PARMDD

On Monday, 27 February 2017 15:00:03 UTC+1, Allan Staller  wrote:
> No. IBM chose not to break thousands upon thousands of programs that were 
> perfectly happy with 100 byte parm fields, provided via JCL.
> They added a new mechanism for those program, where 100 bytes was not 
> sufficient.
> 

Unless you change the JCL to use PARMDD on the EXEC instead of PARM on the 
EXEC, nothing changes.

If you make that change for no purpose, and then the program is doing something 
which relies on there being 100 bytes of data as a maximum implicitly, then you 
may have a problem. But how is that IBM's fault? No-one forced the JCL change.

If you don't change the JCL, the program expecting a maximum of 100 bytes and 
never needing any more than that will work as designed for the next... well, 
forever.

Have you got an example from one of the thousands and thousands of breaks 
caused?

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


::DISCLAIMER::
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The contents of this e-mail and any attachment(s) are confidential and intended 
for the named recipient(s) only.
E-mail transmission is not guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information 
could be intercepted, corrupted,
lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or may contain viruses in 
transmission. The e mail and its contents
(with or without referred errors) shall therefore not attach any liability on 
the originator or HCL or its affiliates.
Views or opinions, if any, presented in this email are solely those of the 
author and may not necessarily reflect the
views or opinions of HCL or its affiliates. Any form of reproduction, 
dissemination, copying, disclosure, modification,
distribution and / or publication of this message without the prior written 
consent of authorized representative of
HCL is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error please 
delete it and notify the sender immediately.
Before opening any email and/or attachments, please check them for viruses and 
other defects.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to