FTP's rarely dominate anything. The only throttle is the speed of the line and the capacity of the receiver and what is happening On the LCU
Steve -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of van der Grijn, Bart (B) Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2017 3:34 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Controlling TCPIP performance Wouldn't that be determined by the priority of the application rather than by the TCPIP task? In this case, the FTP client or server. Bart -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Tracy Adams Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2017 3:26 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Controlling TCPIP performance For obvious reasons we want to run the TCPIP address at a very high dispatching priority. There are times though when we want to throttle back certain functions of the TCPIP stack. I will use FTP as the immediate example. I really don’t want a file transfer to dominate the system :-) TIA for your thoughts and ideas. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
