I was wondering if you have looked at the sample SYS1.SAMPLIB for member IEEACTRT
We typically used the sample IBM Supplied Lizette -----Original Message----- >From: Joel M Ivey <ji...@cio.sc.gov> >Sent: Mar 24, 2017 12:26 PM >To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU >Subject: 0C4, 071, 822 abends in IEFACTRT after zOS 2.2 > >After migrating to zOS 2.2, a vendor-customized IEFACTRT routine >started getting 0c4, 071, and 822 abends in certain highly-used >initiators. We discovered that the vendor portion was supposed >to have been removed prior to 2.2 so we removed their custom >module. Abends still occurred. We downloaded the latest source of >IEFACTRT from CBT109, compared it to what we already had and there >were very few differences. We assembled the latest >source and moved it into production. Same thing. > >An excerpt from IBM support, in reference to the latest CBT109 IEFACTRT: >"This 0C4 abend led to IEFACTRT's recovery routine being invoked. >According the the SCB control block, the recovery routine is located at >+x'972': > >+972 4140 0004 >+976 1904 >+978 4770 C986 <----- >+97C 5802 0000 >+980 41F0 0004 >+984 07FE > >"On entry to this routine, regs R3-R12 are zeroes - so the instruction at >+x'978' triggers a branch to address 00000986. This address is in the PSA, >and is used as a savearea by disabled routines. As a result, the contents at >this address may vary - leading to unpredictable abends - including 0c1 >abends and spin loops." > >Any other shops have issues on zOS 2.2 with CBT109 IEFACTRT? > >Thanks, >Joel M Ivey > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
