I read that as perhaps "so a misguided user FREEMAIN won't foul up LE ..."
Charles -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Tony Harminc Sent: Wednesday, June 7, 2017 8:19 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: AW: Re: LE QuestionT On 7 June 2017 at 08:38, David Crayford <dcrayf...@gmail.com> wrote: > IIRC subpool 1 is for LE internals and subpool 2 for user heap and stack. > Makes sense so presumably a user-space storage overwrite wont corrupt > LE so it can shutdown cleanly. Different subpools of user-key storage won't prevent overwrites. I imagine it's to help with debugging, and perhaps to allow the entire subpoool to be freed in one go even if the pointers are lost/corrupted. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
