> On Jul 6, 2017, at 2:02 AM, Vernooij, Kees (ITOPT1) - KLM > <kees.verno...@klm.com> wrote: > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On >> Behalf Of Jack J. Woehr >> Sent: 05 July, 2017 19:36 >> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU >> Subject: Re: AW: IBM Knowledge Center >> >> Peter Hunkeler wrote: >>> it is just because of the unreliablilty that I want easily >> downloadable PDFs. >> >> I keep huge collections of PDF's anyway, because it's ALWAYS more >> reliable to have them on the huge and cheap PC disk >> than to go fetch on demand from the Internet. >> >> -- >> Jack J. Woehr > > Well, in this case the IBM site is much less reliable than the internet. Just > when I expected the IBM site to show some of the quality that we mainframers > have been taking for granted in our work. > > Kees.
Kees: Sigh…. it is not only IBM .. APPLE and their ICLOUD absolutely stinks in reliability. I can’t tell you the number of times I have gotten a message from APPLE telling me there is a problem. Yes it is fixed in an hour or two. On the other hand GOOGLE has *NEVER* been down for me. IBM should try for Google’s up time, IMO. Look, they said don’t worry you don’t need paper books anymore. We do, just because IBM can’t get their act together on availability (which IBM has claimed they are KING). The KING no longer has any clothes. Stay with paper. Especially during a blackout. Ed ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
