@Skip

Taking this discussion a little sideways. 

I seem to remember that if you used SYS1.LINKLIB in a JOBLIB/STEPLIB 
concatenation with other non-APF authorized libraries, because it is 
SYS1.LINKLIB - the Joblib/Steplib would become APF Authorized whether they were 
or not.

This was due to SYS1.LINKLIB would always be apf authorized by the operating 
system.

Am I remembering this correctly or not?

Thanks

Lizette



> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Jesse 1 Robinson
> Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2017 3:36 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Cobol upgrade 6.2 linklist
> 
> A linklist data set need not be authorized. If you specify LNKAUTH=APFTAB in
> IEASYSxx, then an application library would be authorized only if you created
> an APF entry for it. Assuming that SYS2.PRODLIB is not APF, then there is no
> more danger in linklisting it than allowing users to STEPLIB to it.
> 
> The exposure that my ancient Audit department focused on was devious code
> that could be slipped into production in some random library being STEPLIBed
> to in an individual job. Code like the legendary (fairytale?) case of
> diverting fractions of a cent from accounts payable into a private fund.
> Someone would have to vet the source code, of course, but at least there was
> an audit trail from source to production.
> 
> .
> .
> J.O.Skip Robinson
> Southern California Edison Company
> Electric Dragon Team Paddler
> SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager
> 323-715-0595 Mobile
> 626-543-6132 Office ⇐=== NEW
> robin...@sce.com
> 
 

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to