On 4/6/2018 10:51 PM, Brian Peterson wrote:
Tom, good points.
However, I've been working with the SMF data, and have to say it's not very
helpful. Similar in fact to the system-level health check. The SMF record only
says that User Key common storage was allocated by some program in this address
space.
But which program in this address space did it? The SMF record doesn't say.
We have third party vendor code who's programs run in a variety of address spaces. Is it
the address space flagged by the SMF record, or is the culprit actually a third party
product that interjects it's code into the "victim" or target address space?
The SMF record doesn't say.
Back some years ago, when we were cleaning up obsolete/ancient console
identifiers, I seem to recall a console tracker facility that gave us actual
honest to god program names.
How about something like that?
Brian
Brian,
OMG, this is even better!! You waste time writing a program to parse
the SMF type 30's, and you still don't get the data you need. ROTFLMFAO!
Your second point is awesome, this is a job for the Generic Tracker.
How 'bout it Marna?
Regards,
Tom Conley
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
