> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of R.S.
> Sent: 09 July, 2018 12:47
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Sysplex between two hardware
> 
> W dniu 2018-07-06 o 18:22, Jesse 1 Robinson pisze:
> > We all have lots of questions about your goals here, but the short
> answer to your question is Yes, sysplex is the answer. I assume that
> your two boxes are already connected in some way as to share access to
> data. Turning such a configuration into a sysplex may require some
> additional hardware, but not a lot.
> >
> > -- If you want a full-function parallel sysplex, you would need to
> create an internal coupling facility LPAR (ICF) in each CEC.
> >
> > -- You would need CF links to connect each ICF to the opposite CEC.
> >
> > -- I think you would also need server timing protocol (STP) to keep
> clocks in synch; I have not tried running without STP.
> 
> STP (or earlier sysplex timer) is mandatory for sysplex, even for basic
> sysplex.
> For production parallel sysplex it is good idea to have standalone CF.
> 
> --
> Radoslaw Skorupka
> Lodz, Poland
> 
> 

In this case: yes, but to be precise: not if you run a sysplex on 1 box. The 
required 'common time source' can then be the time of that machine.
I thought the recommendation of a standalone CF was not current anymore.

Kees.

********************************************************
For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message.

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt.
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286
********************************************************


----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to