If something/some program executing in that jobclass (I assume it's a batch initiator) is still running control blocks and not using SWAREQ, then yes it might be needed.
Mark Jacobs Tom Conley wrote on 10/8/18 8:37 PM: Just wondering if there is any reason to still use SWA=BELOW. I'm seeing this in a JES2 parm member and I'm surprised, since I changed to SWA=ABOVE ages ago. Regards, Tom Conley ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu<mailto:lists...@listserv.ua.edu> with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN Please be alert for any emails that may ask you for login information or directs you to login via a link. If you believe this message is a phish or aren't sure whether this message is trustworthy, please send the original message as an attachment to 'phish...@meredith.com<mailto:phish...@meredith.com>'. This electronic message, including any attachments, may contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). You are hereby notified that any unauthorized disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of this message is prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
