Well, I would say (1) it is part of IBM z/OS now. IBM charges big bucks for it, 
so they own the problem, no matter where it came from originally.

But (2) nowhere did I blame IBM explicitly. It is shamefully poor programming 
practice no matter what company hat the programmer was wearing at the time.

Charles


-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Mike Schwab
Sent: Friday, November 9, 2018 6:22 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Venting about error messages and documentation

BPX* is Open System Service, or ported Unix.  Not an IBM Mainframe
style product at all.
On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 4:52 PM Charles Mills <charl...@mcn.org> wrote:
>
> Gosh some of the error message documentation -- really the software design
> leading up to the error message -- is just plain awful!
>
> https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSLTBW_2.3.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r3.bp
> xa800/fsum7131.htm
>
> FSUM7131   Out of space or reached the end of the archive file. If you want
> to go on, type device or file name when ready.
> Explanation
> There is no more room to write the archive or extract members, or the end of
> the archive file has been reached. It is also possible that the archive is
> corrupt.
>
> Was it really necessary to fold three different error conditions into one
> error message? And by the way, "type device or file name" is inappropriate
> in a batch job.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to