Bob, 

        I forgot to mention that there are two Yahoo Groups for Netview and SA 
respectively. I think that this topic might generate more responses in either 
of those forums. Below is the url that I use to logon.

        
https://login.yahoo.com/?.src=ygrp&.intl=us&.lang=en-US&.done=https%3A%2F%2Fgroups.yahoo.com%2Fneo%2Fgroups%2Fall%2Flist



-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf 
Of Richards, Robert B.
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2018 2:32 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: IRXANCHR REXX environment value recommendation

Tony,

Thank you for responding. I, too, was surprised at the lack of response. Maybe 
it has to do with the fact that I asked two days before Thanksgiving!

Bob

-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf 
Of Cieri, Anthony
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2018 2:07 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: IRXANCHR REXX environment value recommendation

        Since I did not notice any responses, I thought I would offer my 2 
cents.....

        We are NOT running z/OS 2.3 yet, but I did have the need to increase 
this value a few years ago. The need was predicated on the installation of 
Tivoli System Automation (TSA). TSA is based upon Netview, which make great use 
of Rexx. I believe that the limit of anchor CBs is at the address space level 
and we only ever noticed a problem in TSA. 

         Our current value is 800 (post TSA) and we generally run at about 400 
control black in use.

        Hth
        Tony
.  

-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf 
Of Richards, Robert B.
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2018 1:00 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: IRXANCHR REXX environment value recommendation

Anyone have a good recommendation for the value of IRXANCHR on a z/OS 2.3 
system?

Current value is 1000, but there may be the need for more REXX environments as 
this value has not been increased in awhile.

What's the new "happy value" everyone is using?  :)

There is no bad answer here.

Bob

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to