I haven't seen many single-CP boxes in general, and haven't seen one running both CFCC and z/OS on that single CP. My expectation is that this would perform poorly. Sync requests would be impossible since PR/SM can't have both the z/OS and CFCC dispatched on the single CP at the same time, so all requests would have to be converted to async.
My expectation is that just using CTCs would probably be faster. I would exercise caution in testing this though, and if it was my production system I probably wouldn't even try. But I'd certainly be curious about the results if you do try it. Note that my reluctance applies specifically to single-CP machines. If I had even two CPs, then I'd be much more willing to give it a shot, depending on current utilization levels and so forth. With dyndisp=thin of course. Scott Chapman On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 00:10:26 -0600, Brian Westerman <brian_wester...@syzygyinc.com> wrote: >Do you have any figures for how much "more" friendly the CPU usage is? > >This box is a single CPU, no ICF, Zipp or zapp. > >Brian > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- >For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, >send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
