On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 17:30:34 +0100, R.S. wrote: > >My other impression is it's simpler to change gazillion (usually less) >of JCL jobs to explicitly point datasets to DASD than using TMM. > Might a JCLLIB member that SETs a few JCL symbols facilitate this? Reduce a gazillion to a handful? Nowadays JCL symbols can even be resolved in SYSIN.
>Of course virtual tape reliefs many pains of tape, but keeping things in >old way is not good for the future. > IBM sometimes seems to have the opposite impression. "Compatibility". -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
