Thx Charles
-----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Farley, Peter x23353 Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2019 11:00 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: XTIOT impact? char dvt_ddname[9]; int dvt_retcode; long long int devtype_info; strcpy(dvt_ddname, "MYDDNAME"); __asm(" DEVTYPE %2,%0\n ST 15,%1" : "=m"(devtype_info), "=m"(dvt_retcode) : "m"(dvt_ddname) : "r0","r1","r15" ); if (dvt_retcode) { /* DD Name is NOT present */ } else { /* DD Name IS present */ } -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> On Behalf Of Charles Mills Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2019 10:45 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: XTIOT impact? The trouble with us darn mainframers -- we don't do change very well. __asm came along to C++ somewhere around V2R2 or V2R3. Thanks. I will have to give DEVTYPE a shot and figure out how to translate it into __asm. I've never done __asm (for the aforementioned reasons). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN