I confess I thought we were talking about a single installation. But as I said, I was asking mainly out if interest, and to see whether IBM have done anything with it, rather than making a recommendation.
Ruz On Sun, 1 Dec 2019, 14:28 Peter Relson, <rel...@us.ibm.com> wrote: > Regarding CVTUSER, the problem, as Charles Mills alluded to, is that at > this point it is hard to "know" that no one else is using it. > It "should" be used only only with the approval of the customer that > "owns" the system. > > But at this point, if you can't know that, many feel it not worth the > risk. > > The same is true of TCBUSER. And that's why we created STCBUSER which > documents the expected rules for its use. > > At this point, many feel that neither CVTUSER nor TCBUSER is safe to use. > YMMV. > > Peter Relson > z/OS Core Technology Design > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN