Rob,
IBM has published some numbers for FBA emulation on SCSI for Linux
guests: "Linux Disk I/O Alternatives" at
http://www.vm.ibm.com/perf/reports/zvm/html/520lxd.html

it's clear there's a CPU overhead penalty for FBA emulation;  but not
clear if the pain would be noticeable.



--------------------------------------------------------
This e-mail, including any attachments, may be confidential, privileged or 
otherwise legally protected. It is intended only for the addressee. If you 
received this e-mail in error or from someone who was not authorized to send it 
to you, do not disseminate, copy or otherwise use this e-mail or its 
attachments.  Please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete 
the e-mail from your system.


-----Original Message-----

From: VM/ESA and z/VM Discussions [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Rob van der Heij
Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2006 3:31 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: DASD I/O performance VM 44 vs. VM 52

On 3/15/06, Romanowski, John (OFT) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

> On VM 5.2 I'm considering trying FBA emulation on SCSI for Linux
guests
> to simplify each Linux guest's configuration and save staff time.
>
> If the additional CPU overhead doesn't hurt much it'll be worth it.

I have no numbers from such a configuration (but would be interested
to see them) so I cannot tell what the impact of this will be. I
normally avoid to express an opinion about things I have not tried and
measured myself.

All I can tell is that the FBA emulation on SCSI was meant for shops
that want their Linux data on SCSI to "simplify configuration and save
staff time"  ;-)  because they have an investment in the "open
storage" area. For those shops it would be a PITA to define S/390 I/O
as well just to hold the basic VM system.

Now if you would say that Open FCP for Linux on z/VM would greatly
benefit from virtualizing that support on z/VM, then I could not agree
more with you. In addition to connecting to and managing the Open FCP
data, I could also see some fun in having a virtual SAN living on VM
paging space. And I am sure that this is not the first time our
friends in z/VM planning see this idea...

Rob
--
Rob van der Heij
Velocity Software, Inc

Reply via email to