SEND was just suggested as an alternative to logging onto and gracefully shutting down/logging off the machine.  FORCE is kind of brutal as if their is any outstanding work that needs to complete, you wind up risking putting a guest (and this is true for any guest) into logoff force pending status,

Kurt Acker  



Rob van der Heij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System <IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU>

03/27/2006 11:00 AM

Please respond to
The IBM z/VM Operating System <IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU>

To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: Performance Toolkit - how to stop it?





On 3/27/06, Kurt Acker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Just log onto guest and issue "logoff"  (You could also send it a #CP LOGOFF from a secuser id if you wanted to avoid logging into that user).

Any reason why SEND CP PERFSVM LOGOFF is better than the proposed
FORCE PERFSVM ?  Doing the SEND properly requires some more
programming than just this because PERFSVM may be in console function
mode and reject the SEND command...

Rob
--
Rob van der Heij
Velocity Software, Inc

Reply via email to