I thought SHARE was more logarithmic than linear, so it would be much
worse than 100-to-1.  Or am I confusing that with something else?

-----Original Message-----
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mark Wheeler
Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 4:54 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Anyone use VMRM?


Leland,

I used it for over a year but recently turned it off and went back to
using staticly-defined share settings. I found it to be generally
sluggish to respond to changing workloads (although I made some mods to
make it moreso). In practice, my observation was that when the system
got busy, it tended to raise every managed virtual machines' SHARE
setting to REL 10000 (because they weren't getting the resources they
needed). Conversely, if the system was running fine, it tended to lower
the managed virtual machines' SHARE settings to REL 1 (for the opposite
reason). The latter situation was even worse because if some virtual
machine with a SHARE REL 100 decided to get busy all of a sudden, it
could be a long time before VMRM reacted to raise the important workload
back up (in the meantime, running at a 100-to-1 disadvantage). I
moderated this effect with mods which set limits on the SHARE setting
changes so as not to go lower than 50 or higher that 5000.

In the end, the downsides (significant) outweighed the benefits (if
any).

Best regards,

Mark Wheeler, 3M Company




 

             Leland Lucius

             <[EMAIL PROTECTED]

             NET>
To 
             Sent by: The IBM          IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU

             z/VM Operating
cc 
             System

             <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject 
             ARK.EDU>                  Anyone use VMRM?

 

 

             06/08/2006 03:37

             PM

 

 

             Please respond to

               The IBM z/VM

             Operating System

             <[EMAIL PROTECTED]

                 ARK.EDU>

 

 





So, how do you folks feel about VMRM?  Does it work as advertised?  Like
David B., I'm "fundamentally lazy" and don't want to have to sit around
and

baby sit these funny looking birds.  Sure, initial hand holding would be
required, but after that I want the system to take care of things for
me.

Thanks,

Leland
--------------------------------------------------------

If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, please notify the sender, 
delete it and do not read, act upon, print, disclose, copy, retain or 
redistribute it. Click here for important additional terms relating to this 
e-mail.     http://www.ml.com/email_terms/
--------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to