Even though I do not run R440, I applaude your efforts in releasing this PERFKIT fix. Having such a useful component of my system "dead in the wat er" during a migration would leave a very bad feeling towards the vendor.
Congradulations on doing the right thing. /Tom Kern On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 10:10:13 -0600, Roger Lunsford wrote: >Folks, R440 is OUT OF SERVICE, and if you want "extended service" for R4 40 >then let us know and we can get someone to contact you. >Thie particular PERFKIT R440 "fix" is something we discussed quite a >bit 'in-house' and thought it was the 'right thing' to make this availab le >to our Perfkit R440 customers, as they are migrating to R5x0. > We *will not* be continueing this, meaning making COR available for the >R440 of Perfkit, as R440 is 'out of service'. This is a 1 time thing th at >we felt we should fix, since we do have alot of you folks still running >R440 while migrating to R510/R520, and without this fix your Perfkit cou ld >very well be dead in the water. We would really like to know about you >R440 customers out there, which is the reason Kurt asked to be notified >when you get the Perfkit R440 fix. >I expect these fixes to TIMEOUT from our WEBSITE in the near future, at >which time the PTF should be available. However, the R440 will probably >be made available as an 'unsupported local mod/circ' for this, off of th e >PERFKIT WEB page only, at www.vm.ibm.com/related/perfkit (which I am su re >all you PERFKIT users have marked!). >We will provide updates when this takes place. >Of course, any concerns please call into the support center! >Thanks for working with us on this one. >Best Regards, Roger Lunsford (IBM PERFKIT Level2/Level3) >======================== ========================= =======================
