> I suppose I should complain to IBM Suppose? Absolutely you should open an IBM Problem Management Report (PMR) to report it! I think... we don't run the Performance Tool Kit. Is there a chance that the "FCONX $PROFILE" is a sample file which is supposed to copied to another (production) disk, and perhaps even renamed when following the installation procedures for the first time?
If so, then next step is obvious (copy/update|rename the file). If it's actually a production file located on a production disk, they you **may** have an APAR-able problem. Mike Walter Hewitt Associates Any opinions expressed herein are mine alone and do not necessarily represent the opinions or policies of Hewitt Associates. "Lewis, David (SCI TW)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "The IBM z/VM Operating System" <IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU> 02/01/2007 10:24 AM Please respond to "The IBM z/VM Operating System" <IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU> To IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU cc Subject SERVICE and PUT2PROD for Performace tool kit. I suppose I should complain to IBM, but I was wondering if anyone else had seen this. The short description is that when I used the SERVICE and PUT2PROD execs to apply the service for PTF UM31957 on user 5VMPTK20 the FCONX $PROFILE on 1CC got replaced. It took me awhile to figure out why VMCF and WEBSERV were not working since I had slept since configuring it. I did not notice in any of the shipped doc that this would happen. So did I miss something or is this BAD behavior? Dave (who is eating my CPU) Lewis The information contained in this e-mail and any accompanying documents may contain information that is confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, or if this message has been addressed to you in error, please immediately alert the sender by reply e-mail and then delete this message, including any attachments. Any dissemination, distribution or other use of the contents of this message by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited.
