On Thursday, 04/12/2007 at 02:48 EST, Bob Heerdink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We just upgraded to Z/VM 5.2 last year, so why is Rexx so old?
Because our customers are not agitating us to upgrade Rexx; not providing descriptions of how their businesses are adversely affected by the lack of <insert function here>. I would guess the vast majority find the current level of Rexx "good enough". Alan Altmark z/VM Development IBM Endicott
