Not likely to be an added impact of the second time (left there purposely 
to show the error).  You don't think address harvesters would miss the 
first time and catch the second, do you?  Maybe I should keep track of new 
SPAM (usually only a few per day) and report back to the list with the 
approximate damage done after a week or so (particularly after a weekend 
when SPAMing must be cheaper).  A good "learning lesson" at my expense.

Mike Walter




"Schuh, Richard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 

Sent by: "The IBM z/VM Operating System" <IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU>
07/16/2007 04:22 PM
Please respond to
"The IBM z/VM Operating System" <IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU>



To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc

Subject
Re: SHARE: Chairbear herding time again!!






And you just displayed it in the thread a second time. Twice as much spam.
 
Regards, 
Richard Schuh 
 

From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 
Behalf Of Mike Walter
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2007 2:08 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: SHARE: Chairbear herding time again!!
 

Sorry folks... that was obviously supposed to go only to Mark Boltz <sigh> 

Note to self: be more careful with the "To:" list!  :-( 
And now I'll pay for that mistake with my e-mail list plainly displayed 
... I'll get SPAMed incessantly for a few months.  <double sigh> 

Mike Walter 
Hewitt Associates 
Any opinions expressed herein are mine alone and do not necessarily 
represent the opinions or policies of Hewitt Associates.



 
The information contained in this e-mail and any accompanying documents may 
contain information that is confidential or otherwise protected from 
disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, or if this 
message has been addressed to you in error, please immediately alert the sender 
by reply e-mail and then delete this message, including any attachments. Any 
dissemination, distribution or other use of the contents of this message by 
anyone other than the intended recipient 
is strictly prohibited.


Reply via email to