AVS does, but TSAF does not. 

Marcy Cortes 

"This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If
you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the
addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose, or take any action based on
this message or any information herein. If you have received this
message in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail
and delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation."


-----Original Message-----
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Wakser, David
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2007 8:07 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: [IBMVM] Defining virtual CTCAs

Marcy:

        Unless I am mistaken, TSAF requires VTAM - which is not running
in the 2nd-level VM.

David Wakser

-----Original Message-----
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Marcy Cortes
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2007 11:04 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Defining virtual CTCAs

Can you use TSAF for what you want to do?    I've used that to shared
SFS between 1st and 2nd level without a real CTC, only virtual.


Marcy Cortes 
 
"This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If
you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the
addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose, or take any action based on
this message or any information herein. If you have received this
message in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail
and delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation."


-----Original Message-----
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Wakser, David
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2007 7:04 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: [IBMVM] Defining virtual CTCAs

Mark:

        That is what I was afraid of - that first level needed a REAL
CTC. Thanks for the confirmation.

David Wakser

-----Original Message-----
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mark Wheeler
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2007 10:01 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Defining virtual CTCAs

The 1st level system (CP) needs to use a real CTC device, so the 2nd
level system will need to have another real CTC device attached to it,
capable of connecting (via IOCP defs) to the first. Or wo a third system
in your CS collection which itself has an ISLINK to the first.

Mark L. Wheeler
IT Infrastructure, 3M Center B224-4N-20, St Paul MN 55144
Tel:  (651) 733-4355, Fax:  (651) 736-7689 mlwheeler at mmm.com

"Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence." Carl Sagan
"Science is organized common sense where many a beautiful theory was
killed by an ugly fact." Thomas Henry Huxley



 

             "Stracka, James

             (GTI)"

             <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To 
             .com>                     IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU

             Sent by: The IBM
cc 
             z/VM Operating

             System
Subject 
             <[EMAIL PROTECTED]         Re: Defining virtual CTCAs

             ARK.EDU>

 

 

             10/10/2007 08:48

             AM

 

 

             Please respond to

               The IBM z/VM

             Operating System

             <[EMAIL PROTECTED]

                 ARK.EDU>

 

 





In the directory for your 2nd level guest you would have:
             SPECIAL 0D90 FCTC 1stlevelSVM

For your other 1st level SVM:
             SPECIAL 0F11 FCTC 2ndlevelguestid

The on both issue a COUPLE command because you may not know which is
second:
             CP COUPLE 0D90 1stlevelSVM 0F11 And
             CP COUPLE 0F11 2ndlevelguestid 0D90

The on the 2nd level system ATTACH the CTC to the SVM needing it.

You need not do FCTC, look at the DEFINE command for the type of CTC you
desire.

-----Original Message-----
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Wakser, David
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2007 9:34 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Defining virtual CTCAs


All:

             I have the need to define a virtual CTC between a
first-level zVM machine and a 2nd-level zVM machine. This is in order to
activate ISLINK between those two machines.

             Since the virtual CTCs need to "belong" to the z/VM
"system" I am at a loss as to how to do this. Can anyone help lift the
fog?

David Wakser
InfoCrossing
--------------------------------------------------------

This message w/attachments (message) may be privileged, confidential or
proprietary, and if you are not an intended recipient, please notify the
sender, do not use or share it and delete it. Unless specifically
indicated, this message is not an offer to sell or a solicitation of any
investment products or other financial product or service, an official
confirmation of any transaction, or an official statement of Merrill
Lynch.
Subject to applicable law, Merrill Lynch may monitor, review and retain
e-communications (EC) traveling through its networks/systems. The laws
of the country of each sender/recipient may impact the handling of EC,
and EC may be archived, supervised and produced in countries other than
the country in which you are located. This message cannot be guaranteed
to be secure or error-free. This message is subject to terms available
at the following link: http://www.ml.com/e-communications_terms/. By
messaging with Merrill Lynch you consent to the foregoing.
--------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to