On Jan 29, 2008 9:45 PM, Huegel, Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It may be a requirement to ask IBM to prepare better 'rejection > documentation'.
But in the end, you'd like IBM not to reject the requirements, but implement them... Making it harder to reject them is a way to influence the trade-off, but not the most efficient way. I would hope there *is* in the plan a certain amount of effort to implement user requirements (if not, then the entire circus could be stopped). It might be good if IBM would explain which user requirements are being implemented with those resources. -Rob
