The fact that it is ³CP OWNED² and not ³CP SYSTEM² would lead me to wonder about your statement ³Being that the volume is already labeled should I assume that it has allocated to lets say PERM?². I wouldn¹t make such an assumption, especially if someone took the trouble to put it in the CP Owned list. Get a read-only link to the volume and run ICKDSF to get a list of the allocation map of the device. A sample follows:
link vmtestp ca05 ca05 rr DASD CA05 LINKED R/O; R/W BY 2 USERS Ready; T=0.01/0.01 07:32:44 ickdsf ICK030E DEFINE INPUT DEVICE: FN FT FM, "CONSOLE", OR "READER" console CONSOLE ICK031E DEFINE OUTPUT DEVICE: FN FT FM, "CONSOLE", OR "PRINTER" console CONSOLE ICKDSF - CMS/XA/ESA DEVICE SUPPORT FACILITIES 17.0 TIME: 07:32:51 07/09/08 PAGE 1 ENTER INPUT COMMAND: cpvol list unit(ca05) nvfy CPVOL LIST UNIT(CA05) NVFY ICK00700I DEVICE INFORMATION FOR CA05 IS CURRENTLY AS FOLLOWS: PHYSICAL DEVICE = 3390 STORAGE CONTROLLER = 3990 STORAGE CONTROL DESCRIPTOR = E9 DEVICE DESCRIPTOR = 0C ADDITIONAL DEVICE INFORMATION = 48001F3C TRKS/CYL = 15, # PRIMARY CYLS = 32760 ICK04030I DEVICE IS A PEER TO PEER REMOTE COPY VOLUME ICK00703I DEVICE IS OPERATED AS A MINIDISK ICK03090I VOLUME SERIAL = 540RES ICK03024I DEVICE IS CURRENTLY FORMATTED WITHOUT FILLER RECORDS ICK03000I CPVOL REPORT FOR CA05 FOLLOWS: ICK03021I CA05 IS FORMATTED FOR VM/ESA MODE CYLINDER ALLOCATION CURRENTLY IS AS FOLLOWS: TYPE START END TOTAL ---- ----- --- ----- PERM 0 38 39 PARM 39 158 120 PARM 159 278 120 PARM 279 398 120 PERM 399 32759 32361 ICK00001I FUNCTION COMPLETED, HIGHEST CONDITION CODE WAS 0 07:33:14 07/09/08 ENTER INPUT COMMAND: end END ICK00002I ICKDSF PROCESSING COMPLETE. MAXIMUM CONDITION CODE WAS 0 Ready; T=0.01/0.01 07:33:16 If you find something other than PERM in the allocation map, then you¹d best not monkey with the volume unless you really know what you¹re doing. Systems will go down for much less. -- Robert P. Nix Mayo Foundation .~. RO-OE-5-55 200 First Street SW /V\ 507-284-0844 Rochester, MN 55905 /( )\ ----- ^^-^^ "In theory, theory and practice are the same, but in practice, theory and practice are different." On 7/8/08 5:03 PM, "Howard Rifkind" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks folks. > > The directory showed that the disk is allocated 100% to one user id. I'll > have to find out if that user id really needs a whole 3390/9. > > Thanks again. > >>>> >>> "Huegel, Thomas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 7/8/2008 5:50 PM >>> > Well the "1" means there is 1 user linked to that disk.. that user is probably > maint's minidisk. > CPFMTXA 499 VPWK03 <==== the 499 is a virtual address > I don't remember, but you may need to: > a) det it from maint (the mdisk) > b) det it from the system (real addr) > c) att to maint > d) CPFMTXA > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf >> Of Howard Rifkind >> Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2008 4:41 PM >> To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU >> Subject: CP Owned Volume Question >> >> I have a volume with a label of VPWK03 at address 499. >> >> Being that the volume is already labeled should I assume that it has >> allocated to lets say PERM? >> >> Volume shows up as follows: >> >> q 499 >> DASD 0499 CP OWNED VPWK03 1 >> I would think that being it is showing a '1' it is in use by system. >> >> I want to allocate a bunch of minidisks on the volume but am having problems >> getting it to be available. >> >> In the directory I have it define as a full pack mini under Maint. >> >> I'm getting the following: >> >> CPFMTXA 499 VPWK03 >> HCPCCF0040E DEVICE 0499 DOES NOT EXIST >> >> I haven't done this for a while. How can I get this resolved so I can start >> to allocate minidisks on the volume? >> >> Any help is appreciated. Thanks >> >> >> >> >> >> _____________ >> LEGAL NOTICE >> Unless expressly stated otherwise, this message is confidential >> and may be privileged. It is intended for the addressee(s) only. >> Access to this E-mail by anyone else is unauthorized. >> If you are not an addressee, any disclosure or copying of the >> contents of this E-mail or any action taken (or not taken) in >> reliance on it is unauthorized and may be unlawful. If you are not an >> addressee, please inform the sender immediately, then delete this >> message and empty from your trash. > > > > _____________ > LEGAL NOTICE > Unless expressly stated otherwise, this message is confidential > and may be privileged. It is intended for the addressee(s) only. > Access to this E-mail by anyone else is unauthorized. > If you are not an addressee, any disclosure or copying of the > contents of this E-mail or any action taken (or not taken) in > reliance on it is unauthorized and may be unlawful. If you are not an > addressee, please inform the sender immediately, then delete this > message and empty from your trash. >