The fact that it is ³CP OWNED² and not ³CP SYSTEM² would lead me to wonder
about your statement ³Being that the volume is already labeled should I
assume that it has allocated to lets say PERM?². I wouldn¹t make such an
assumption, especially if someone took the trouble to put it in the CP Owned
list. Get a read-only link to the volume and run ICKDSF to get a list of the
allocation map of the device. A sample follows:

link vmtestp ca05 ca05 rr
DASD CA05 LINKED R/O; R/W BY     2 USERS
Ready; T=0.01/0.01 07:32:44
ickdsf
ICK030E DEFINE INPUT  DEVICE: FN FT FM, "CONSOLE", OR "READER"
console
CONSOLE
ICK031E DEFINE OUTPUT DEVICE: FN FT FM, "CONSOLE", OR "PRINTER"
console
CONSOLE
ICKDSF - CMS/XA/ESA DEVICE SUPPORT FACILITIES 17.0                TIME:
07:32:51        07/09/08     PAGE   1

ENTER INPUT COMMAND:
cpvol list unit(ca05) nvfy
CPVOL LIST UNIT(CA05) NVFY
ICK00700I DEVICE INFORMATION FOR CA05 IS CURRENTLY AS FOLLOWS:
PHYSICAL DEVICE = 3390
STORAGE CONTROLLER = 3990
STORAGE CONTROL DESCRIPTOR = E9
DEVICE DESCRIPTOR = 0C
ADDITIONAL DEVICE INFORMATION = 48001F3C
TRKS/CYL = 15, # PRIMARY CYLS = 32760
ICK04030I DEVICE IS A PEER TO PEER REMOTE COPY VOLUME
ICK00703I DEVICE IS OPERATED AS A MINIDISK
ICK03090I VOLUME SERIAL = 540RES
ICK03024I DEVICE IS CURRENTLY FORMATTED WITHOUT FILLER RECORDS
ICK03000I CPVOL REPORT FOR CA05 FOLLOWS:

ICK03021I CA05 IS FORMATTED FOR VM/ESA MODE

CYLINDER ALLOCATION CURRENTLY IS AS FOLLOWS:
TYPE     START      END        TOTAL
----     -----      ---        -----
PERM     0          38         39
PARM     39         158        120
PARM     159        278        120
PARM     279        398        120
PERM     399        32759      32361

ICK00001I FUNCTION COMPLETED, HIGHEST CONDITION CODE WAS 0
07:33:14    07/09/08

ENTER INPUT COMMAND:
end
END

ICK00002I ICKDSF PROCESSING COMPLETE. MAXIMUM CONDITION CODE WAS 0
Ready; T=0.01/0.01 07:33:16

If you find something other than PERM in the allocation map, then you¹d best
not monkey with the volume unless you really know what you¹re doing. Systems
will go down for much less.

-- 
Robert P. Nix          Mayo Foundation        .~.
RO-OE-5-55             200 First Street SW    /V\
507-284-0844           Rochester, MN 55905   /( )\
-----                                        ^^-^^
"In theory, theory and practice are the same, but
 in practice, theory and practice are different."






On 7/8/08 5:03 PM, "Howard Rifkind" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Thanks folks.
>  
> The directory showed that the disk is allocated 100% to one user id.  I'll
> have to find out if that user id really needs a whole 3390/9.
>  
> Thanks again.
> 
>>>> >>> "Huegel, Thomas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 7/8/2008 5:50 PM >>>
> Well the "1" means there is 1 user linked to that disk.. that user is probably
> maint's minidisk.
>  CPFMTXA 499 VPWK03   <==== the 499 is a virtual address
> I don't remember, but you may need to:
> a) det it from maint (the mdisk)
> b) det it from the system (real addr)
> c) att to maint 
> d) CPFMTXA
>  
>                  
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf
>> Of Howard Rifkind
>> Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2008 4:41 PM
>> To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
>> Subject: CP Owned Volume Question
>> 
>> I have a volume with a label of VPWK03 at address 499.
>>  
>> Being that the volume is already labeled should I assume that it has
>> allocated to lets say PERM?
>>  
>> Volume shows up as follows:
>>  
>> q 499           
>> DASD 0499 CP OWNED  VPWK03   1
>> I would think that being it is showing a '1' it is in use by system.
>>  
>> I want to allocate a bunch of minidisks on the volume but am having problems
>> getting it to be available.
>>  
>> In the directory I have it define as a full pack mini under Maint.
>>  
>> I'm getting the following:
>>  
>> CPFMTXA 499 VPWK03
>> HCPCCF0040E DEVICE 0499 DOES NOT EXIST
>>  
>> I haven't done this for a while.  How can I get this resolved so I can start
>> to allocate minidisks on the volume?
>>  
>> Any help is appreciated.  Thanks
>>  
>>  
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _____________
>> LEGAL NOTICE
>> Unless expressly stated otherwise, this message is confidential
>> and may be privileged. It is intended for the addressee(s) only.
>> Access to this E-mail by anyone else is unauthorized.
>> If you are not an addressee, any disclosure or copying of the
>> contents of this E-mail or any action taken (or not taken) in
>> reliance on it is unauthorized and may be unlawful. If you are not an
>> addressee, please inform the sender immediately, then delete this
>> message and empty from your trash.
> 
> 
> 
> _____________
> LEGAL NOTICE
> Unless expressly stated otherwise, this message is confidential
> and may be privileged. It is intended for the addressee(s) only.
> Access to this E-mail by anyone else is unauthorized.
> If you are not an addressee, any disclosure or copying of the
> contents of this E-mail or any action taken (or not taken) in
> reliance on it is unauthorized and may be unlawful. If you are not an
> addressee, please inform the sender immediately, then delete this
> message and empty from your trash.
> 


Reply via email to