Sorry, Rob, but I would have to say that your idea of SPOOLCHN sounds to
me like "bit twiddling" when someone would calculate that 2 LR
instructions used a cpu cycle less than 1 SS instruction. CPU cycles
are getting cheap. I don't doubt that there are installations that
couldn't afford to use cycles, but SPOOLCHN will do a lot more than look
for damaged spool files.
Jim
Rob van der Heij wrote:
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 5:08 PM, Jim Bohnsack <jab...@cornell.edu> wrote:
SPOOLCHN on the IBM download site (http://www.vm.ibm.com/download/packages/)
is very useful for keeping the spool healthy.
I think that is pretty overkill. Its purpose is to walk the chains of
spool blocks when the structure is damaged or you have lost a spool
volume. It requires a lot of resources and authorization. In a normal
situation you should have enough with class D queries...
Rob
--
Jim Bohnsack
Cornell University
(972) 596-6377 home/office
(972) 342-5823 cell
jab...@cornell.edu
