On Tuesday, 04/07/2009 at 12:15 EDT, Shimon Lebowitz <shimon...@gmail.com> 
wrote:

> * On z530test:  
> ifconfig  
> VSW10    inet addr: 10.0.7.153 mask: 255.255.0.0  
> 
> UNDR     inet addr: 10.1.99.153 P-t-P: 10.1.31.253 mask: 255.255.0.0  

Both of those and the NETSTAT GATE look fine.

> =========
> * On UNDR:
> 
> IFCONFIG 
> Z530     inet addr: 10.1.31.253 mask: 255.255.0.0 
> UP BROADCAST MULTICAST MTU: 9216 
> vdev: 0900 type: CTC portnumber: 1 
> cpu: 0 forwarding: ENABLED 
> RX bytes: 3864 TX bytes: 3864 
> Ready; T=0.08/0.10 15:49:38

Hmmm....   you're missing the p-T-p widget.  That's not good.
 
> Subnet Address  Subnet Mask      FirstHop        Flgs PktSz Metric Link  

> --------------  -----------      --------        ---- ----- ------ 
------ 
> Default         <none>           10.1.99.153     UGS  4096  <none> Z530  

> 10.1.0.0        255.255.0.0      <direct>        UT   9216  <none> Z530  


... and I see why.  You don't have a HOST entry.

> IFCONFIG Z530 DOWN  
> DTCIFC2610E The POINTOPOINT operand is required, but has not been 
specified 
> Ready(00008); T=0.08/0.10 16:02:58  
> 
> ***(I did NOT understand that error at 
> all!)  

Uhh, yup.  That looks like a bug.  Feel free to open a PMR.      
 
> 16:14:35 DTCOSD223E OSD device d...@c00: Return code E010 from DELIP for 
IPv4 
> 16:14:35 DTCOSD247I OSD device d...@c00: Unassigned IPv4 address 
10.1.31.253 
> 16:14:35 DTCOSD223E OSD device d...@b00: Return code E010 from DELIP for 
IPv4 
> 16:14:35 DTCOSD247I OSD device d...@b00: Unassigned IPv4 address 
10.1.31.253 
:
> I restarted both TCPIPs after adding this line to the profile:
> MORETRACE IP-UP IP-DOWN ICMP
> but I do not see any trace info from it.

Sorry.  I should have also said to use the SCREEN or FILE options.  The 
trace data is being thrown into the bit bucket.

> What is that DELIP from the OSA?

That is the stack trying to delete your partner's IP address from the each 
OSA's address table.  I'm not sure why you're getting E010 (not found). 
Are they layer 2 or 3?

> What exactly did you mean by "tightened the rules".
> My mask for the CTC was /16.

You can no longer use a subnet mask of 255.255.255.255.

Alan Altmark
z/VM Development
IBM Endicott

Reply via email to