> I also cleaned up spool so both systems have roughly the same  number of 
spool files.
In the future, "roughly the same number of spool files" isn't he same as 
knowing the size of the spool files.

>From a Class D userid, 'CP Query RDR EXP' (and also for PUN, and PRT) will 
help provide the answer (via a little piping), since the EXP operand 
displays the number of 4K SPOOL pages occupied by each file.

But finding the appropriate PTF is better still!  Happy New Year, indeed!

Mike Walter
Hewitt Associates
The opinions expressed herein are mine alone, not my employer's.



"Marcy Cortes" <marcy.d.cor...@wellsfargo.com> 

Sent by: "The IBM z/VM Operating System" <IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU>
01/05/2010 03:27 PM
Please respond to
"The IBM z/VM Operating System" <IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU>



To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc

Subject
Re: Amount of CP dump space needed






But isn't the spxtape use cleared up by "set dump off#set dump dasd" ?
That just made it grow...

Q RECORDING shows nothing pending retrieval.
I also cleaned up spool so both systems have roughly the same  number of 
spool files.


Marcy 

"This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If 
you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee, 
you must not use, copy, disclose, or take any action based on this message 
or any information herein. If you have received this message in error, 
please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this 
message. Thank you for your cooperation."


-----Original Message-----
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On 
Behalf Of Tom Duerbusch
Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 11:44 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: [IBMVM] Amount of CP dump space needed

There was a problem with spxtape which I thought was fixed by z/VM 5.4.

But as we see it, on z/VM 5.2....

SPXTAPE tried to buffer as much as possible.
As spxtape is a CP function, all of its buffers end up requiring slots on 
the CP Dump dataset.
When spxtape finishes, there is no automatic way off reducing the amount 
of slots used, as an CP abend might happen a few seconds, minutes after 
spxtape ended and well, "what if it was the cause?".

I take it that there are other "CP" functions that may end up buffering or 
using storage that requires slots in the CP DUMP area.  Something like "Q 
RECORDING" and if nothing is servicing those records, CP is buffering 
them.

Of course, the page tables and all that storage related stuff needs to be 
dumped in case of a CP abend, so the CP DUMP slots are allocated.  So the 
memory size of the LPAR is a consideration, as well as the sum of the 
virtual sizes of all the machines that are logged on is also a 
consideration.

Tom Duerbusch
THD Consulting

>>> Marcy Cortes <marcy.d.cor...@wellsfargo.com> 1/5/2010 1:09 PM >>>
How is the amount of CP dump space calculated?

We have a system that seems to be using at lot more than the others. 
Everything is pretty much identical across the LPARs HW wise (access to 
all the same devices, etc) and SW wise (z/VM 5.4 RSU 0902). 

Here's an example.

System A:

q dump 
DASD F1B0 dump unit CP IPL pages 1140129 
Ready; T=0.01/0.01 13:02:40 

System J:
q dump 
DASD F00D dump unit CP IPL pages 169959 
Ready; T=0.01/0.01 13:03:32 


Both systems have 32G (28 central, 4 expanded).  If anything System A has 
less memory usage (does not page with 10 linux ) and System J does (16 
linux).

I tried set dump off and then set dump DASD to see if that would change 
the numbers.  The number on system A grew (from 1131137 to 1140129) while 
System J did not change.

Why would be they be so radically different?


Marcy 



"This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If 
you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee, 
you must not use, copy, disclose, or take any action based on this message 
or any information herein. If you have received this message in error, 
please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this 
message. Thank you for your cooperation."






The information contained in this e-mail and any accompanying documents may 
contain information that is confidential or otherwise protected from 
disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, or if this 
message has been addressed to you in error, please immediately alert the sender 
by reply e-mail and then delete this message, including any attachments. Any 
dissemination, distribution or other use of the contents of this message by 
anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited. All messages 
sent to and from this e-mail address may be monitored as permitted by 
applicable law and regulations to ensure compliance with our internal policies 
and to protect our business. E-mails are not secure and cannot be guaranteed to 
be error free as they can be intercepted, amended, lost or destroyed, or 
contain viruses. You are deemed to have accepted these risks if you communicate 
with us by e-mail. 

Reply via email to