You do not win the prize. You left out two modules, RXS and RXU, that need to be reassembled, according to others who replied off-list. Either that or you win it for not including superfluous assemblies and they lose.
Thanks to all who have replied, both those who saw the whole picture and those who were trying to sabotage the effort.:-) Regards, Richard Schuh > -----Original Message----- > From: The IBM z/VM Operating System > [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Alan Altmark > Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2010 3:56 AM > To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU > Subject: Re: RXSOCKET > > On Monday, 05/17/2010 at 06:00 EDT, "Schuh, Richard" <rsc...@visa.com> > wrote: > > Is the 5000 socket limit for a user of RXSOCKET architectural or > arbitrary? If > > arbitrary, will it be am major effort to increase it to > something in > > the > 12-16K > > range? And is increasing it something that the customer can > do or is > > it > a trade > > secret? > > One of the components of RXSOCKET MODULE is DMSRXV ASSEMBLE. > It uses the MAX_DESC variable defined in SOCBLOKS COPY > contained in DMSGPI MACLIB: > 1. Update SOCBLOCKS (local mod) > 2. Rebuild DMSGPI MACLIB > 3. Reassemble DMSRXV (HLASM required) > 4. Rebuild RXSOCKET MODULE > > No guarantees. You-Know-Who would say "Not supported." Yeah, yeah. > Whatever. > > -- Chuckie >
