I did encounter similar problem installing RedHat Linux 5.4. The installer was 
not reading the Conf/PARM(?) file and was prompting for the values to be 
entered. The installer bug, apparently, shows up when the guest had only one 
virtual CPU defined and the work around, at least for me, was to define 2 
virtual CPUs just for the installation. If this work around solves your issue 
then do remember to take off unnecessary virtual CPU after the 
installation/upgrade. 

Regards,
Ashwin Bhemidhi 

-----Original Message-----
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf 
Of Tom Duggan
Sent: Monday, August 09, 2010 10:27 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: SLES11 PARMFILE entries not being read correctly

I'm posting here since the initial execution of the SLES 11 upgrade happe=
ns
in a z/VM virtual machine prior to establishing a Linux session. 

Apologies if this is inappropriate; I will post to the 
Linux 390 list if needed (I'm having major difficulties posting to ANY
list, so I'm not even going to attempt cross/multiple postings <g>)

So, on to the issue.......

I saw in an earlier post(sometime last year) someone having a *similar*
problem as I am :

The user was supplying values for Portname and NameServer, but still gett=
ing
prompts during the install.

The response to the user was to supply a null value in the PARMFILE for t=
he
two parameters in question, and to supply "0" (or "1" depending on the
configuration of the card) for Portno= as this could possibly suppress =
the
prompt for the DNS server.

My issue is that I'm supplying a null value for portname as it is not
defined on the card, and I am supplying an address for NameServer and sti=
ll
receiving prompts.

I'm reading through Section 4.4 The parmfile - Automating the System
Configuration in the SLES 11 Deployment Guide, and not seeing anything ab=
out
how to supply null values.

This isn't a show-stopper, but I'm looking to completely automate this
portion of the SLES 11 install.  If it doesn't happen, c'est le vie.....

Thanks!

-Tom

Reply via email to