Alyce --  not sure what you mean, at least in the context of flashcopy.. ?
If you mean CLONEBKP, I believe it's making a copy of the spool volume(s),
so NSS/DCSS/etc would be preserved..

Scott Rohling

On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 5:20 PM, Austin, Alyce (CIV) <aus...@nps.edu> wrote:

> ********
>
> What about the NSSs?****
>
> ** **
>
> Thanks,****
>
> Alyce****
>
> ** **
>  ------------------------------
>
> *From:* **The IBM z/VM Operating System** [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU]
> *On Behalf Of *Eric R Farman
> *Sent:* Friday, June 17, 2011 1:57 PM
>
> *To:* IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
> *Subject:* Re: CLONEBKP: New package at zVM/downloads
> ****
>
>  ** **
>
> FLASHCOPY SYNC is only useful for older (Version 1) FlashCopy hardware.
>  Modern storage subsystems, such as DS8000, will not change their behavior
> with this parameter.  From the FLASHCOPY helpfile:
>
> SYNChronous
>     (For FlashCopy Version 1 hardware) tells CP to process the command
>     immediately and to wait until the hardware has accepted all parameters,
>     all messages from the Enterprise Storage Server(R) (ESS) subsystem have
>     been processed, and the FLASHCOPY command completes.
>
> As stated previously, issuing a second FLASHCOPY command while one is in
> progress will result in an error.
>
> The CP QUERY FLASHCOPY HARDWARE command can be used to determine if a
> FlashCopy has completed it's background copy or not, regardless of whether
> or not it's a persistent relationship.
>
> Regards,
>            Eric
>
> Eric Farman
> z/VM I/O Development
> IBM ****Endicott**, ** NY****
> (607)429-4958 (tie 620)
>
> ****
>
> From: ****
>
> Kris Buelens <kris.buel...@gmail.com> ****
>
> To: ****
>
> IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU ****
>
> Date: ****
>
> 06/17/2011 04:03 PM ****
>
> Subject: ****
>
> Re: CLONEBKP: New package at zVM/downloads ****
>
> Sent by: ****
>
> **The IBM z/VM Operating System** <IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU>****
>
> ** **
>  ------------------------------
>
>
>
>
> FLASHCOPY SYNC does not wait until the target disk is copied.  So, you can
> try to launch a second FLASHCOPY while the previous is still busy, and your
> attempt will fail.
>
> 2011/6/17 Alan Altmark <alan_altm...@us.ibm.com>
> On Friday, 06/17/2011 at 01:37 EDT, Scott Rohling
> <scott.rohl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > It will likely fail, with a message that the target is not in the
> required
> > state and is the target of an existing flashcopy...    until the
> background
> > copying finishes -- you won't be able to flash to the same target.
>
> This sounds like a good use of the FLASHCOPY SYNCH option.
>
> Alan Altmark
>
> z/VM and Linux on System z Consultant
> IBM System Lab Services and Training*
> *ibm.com/systems/services/labservices
> office: 607.429.3323
> mobile; 607.321.7556*
> *alan_altm...@us.ibm.com
> IBM Endicott
>
>
>
> --
> Kris Buelens,
> IBM Belgium, VM customer support ****
>

Reply via email to