Re: [icinga-users] Icinga vs Sensu

Sun, 06 Jul 2014 06:22:19 -0700

On 27.06.2014 01:48, Max Zhang wrote:
I would love to get ideas on why Icinga is the better choice, I'm trying to convince others that Icinga2 is the better choice. Sensu seems to have a better way for configuration, users only set up agents and have master server subscribe to the agent.

Maybe you should ask the sensu ppl too. I've only heard that people still use Icinga next to Sensu due to the notification and alert capabilities next to the modular enhancements possible with own plugins, scripts, etc

Currently a comparison doesn't exist, maybe community members will write one. But it shouldn't be the task of an upstream project to compare itself to competitors, unless there's a certain requirement (such as leaving nagios as fork, and overcoming the shortcomings of the predecessor).



Thank you,
Max


_______________________________________________
icinga-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.icinga.org/mailman/listinfo/icinga-users


-- 
Michael Friedrich, DI (FH)
Application Developer

NETWAYS GmbH | Deutschherrnstr. 15-19 | D-90429 Nuernberg
Tel: +49 911 92885-0 | Fax: +49 911 92885-77
GF: Julian Hein, Bernd Erk | AG Nuernberg HRB18461
http://www.netways.de | [email protected]

** Open Source Backup Conference 2014 - September - osbconf.org **
** Puppet Camp Duesseldorf 2014 - Oktober - netways.de/puppetcamp **
** OSMC 2014 - November - netways.de/osmc **
** OpenNebula Conf 2014 - Dezember - opennebulaconf.com **



_______________________________________________
icinga-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.icinga.org/mailman/listinfo/icinga-users

Reply via email to