Am 29.07.2015 um 14:57 schrieb Zachary McGibbon:
Ok I could work on migrating to the new interface however I do have one 
question.  Most everyone here at McGill uses Nagstamon on their desktop which 
talks to the classic CGIs.  If I want to keep supporting this option will I 
still need to install the classicui or does icingaweb2 provide a similar 
interface for external applications like nagstamon?

Afaik the nagstamon developer is waiting for the rest api before implementing 
support for icingaweb2. But you may kindly ask him yourself :)

Kind regards,
Michael



- Zac

On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 7:03 PM, Michael Friedrich 
<<mailto:[email protected]>[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
 wrote:
Am 28.07.2015 um 18:39 schrieb Zachary McGibbon:
Hi, I am in the process of converting all our Icinga1 config to Icinga2 and I'm 
running into a problem when trying to get user permissions setup right.

We have many departments accessing our Icinga console, and we don't want them 
to necessarily see all hosts/services that we monitor.

Here is an example of our Icinga1 config (removing unnecessary lines for the 
example)

define host{
       name                       poe1
       contact_groups             host_poe
}

define contactgroup{
       contactgroup_name           host_poe
       contactgroup_members        noc
}

define contactgroup{
       contactgroup_name           noc
       alias                       noc
}

define contactgroup{
       contactgroup_name           ops
       alias                       ops
}

In this example above, only the users in the 'noc' group would be able to see 
the host 'poe1' in the classic ui, I believe these are the flag I set for this 
to happen in cgi.cfg is:

show_partial_hostgroups=1

So now I'm trying out how to replicate something like this in Icinga2.

For now I'm not at the point of doing notifications as those will all go to an 
ITOM solution which will do the proper filtering.

From what I can see you can't assign hosts into UserGroups in Icinga2?  Am I 
missing something?

Using Notifications with Users as mapping for the compat host/service contacts is an ugly 
workaround, which is why we generally don't recommend doing that with Icinga 2 and 
Classic UI. Rather look into Icinga Web 2 offering more capabilities on limiting views to 
certain users and scratch that "contacts for auth"-idea.

On a related note - we won't implement new Icinga 2 features into 1.x 
interfaces such as Classic UI or Web1, there's way more possible with Icinga 
Web 2 in the future.

Kind regards,
Michael


- Zac



_______________________________________________
icinga-users mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://lists.icinga.org/mailman/listinfo/icinga-users



-- 
Michael Friedrich, DI (FH)
Application Developer

NETWAYS GmbH | Deutschherrnstr. 15-19 | D-90429 Nuernberg
Tel: +49 911 92885-0 | Fax: +49 911 92885-77<tel:%2B49%20911%2092885-77>
GF: Julian Hein, Bernd Erk | AG Nuernberg HRB18461
http://www.netways.de | <mailto:[email protected]> 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

** OSBConf 2015 - September - osbconf.org<http://osbconf.org> **
** OSMC 2015 - November - netways.de/osmc<http://netways.de/osmc> **

_______________________________________________
icinga-users mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://lists.icinga.org/mailman/listinfo/icinga-users





_______________________________________________
icinga-users mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://lists.icinga.org/mailman/listinfo/icinga-users



-- 
Michael Friedrich, DI (FH)
Application Developer

NETWAYS GmbH | Deutschherrnstr. 15-19 | D-90429 Nuernberg
Tel: +49 911 92885-0 | Fax: +49 911 92885-77
GF: Julian Hein, Bernd Erk | AG Nuernberg HRB18461
http://www.netways.de | [email protected]

** OSBConf 2015 - September - osbconf.org **
** OSMC 2015 - November - netways.de/osmc **
_______________________________________________
icinga-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.icinga.org/mailman/listinfo/icinga-users

Reply via email to