On Mon, 30 Jan 2012, Michael Friedrich wrote:
> i would at least be interested in the method acquiring this, as well as
> some code snippets/patches ofc. does it break compatibility or is it
> just a feature enhancement?
It's a hack that makes use of an invalid return status (-1) in an
NSCA packet to attach a comment to either a host or a comment. I very
deliberately opted to go "downwards" a sit looks like the normal
expansion direction is "up". For regular NSCA packets it works just
like the "stock" version.
I think the entire modification is perhaps six lines of code.
Cheers!
+------------------------------------------------+---------------------+
| Carl Richard Friend (UNIX Sysadmin) | West Boylston |
| Minicomputer Collector / Enthusiast | Massachusetts, USA |
| mailto:[email protected] +---------------------+
| http://users.rcn.com/crfriend/museum | ICBM: 42:22N 71:47W |
+------------------------------------------------+---------------------+
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow!
The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers
is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3,
Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-d2d
_______________________________________________
icinga-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/icinga-users