On Fri, 13 Sep 2013, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> Christophe HAEN schrieb am Friday, den 13. September 2013:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> in our case, the cgi interface was implying a heavier load than the
>> icinga-web one.
> That is probably only the case if you need idoutils. If you don't use
> idoutils, -classic should be lighter.
If the OP wants to use Web, he's going to have to use IDOutils.
I haven't seen anything published concerning performance, but when
I loaded Icinga-Web onto a 440MHz Sun SPARC system with 1 GB of main-
store it pretty well crushed the machine by immediately driving it
deeply virtual. That's with 15 hosts and 51 services (the number of
services is misleading -- I have a lot of "services" that actually
monitor several parameters at once). Classic runs on it just fine.
Cheers!
+------------------------------------------------+---------------------+
| Carl Richard Friend (UNIX Sysadmin) | West Boylston |
| Minicomputer Collector / Enthusiast | Massachusetts, USA |
| mailto:[email protected] +---------------------+
| http://users.rcn.com/crfriend/museum | ICBM: 42:22N 71:47W |
+------------------------------------------------+---------------------+
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
How ServiceNow helps IT people transform IT departments:
1. Consolidate legacy IT systems to a single system of record for IT
2. Standardize and globalize service processes across IT
3. Implement zero-touch automation to replace manual, redundant tasks
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=51271111&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
icinga-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/icinga-users
