Saya benci android...karena racunnya kuat sekaliiiii.....
On Jan 11, 2012 12:46 PM, "Amurwo Wikan" <amurwowikandr...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Saya benci android... buat saya kecanduan...
> *benci = benar-benar cinta :D
>
> Sent from Nexus S Ice Cream Sandwich CyanogenMod-9
> On Jan 11, 2012 1:04 AM, "Andika Ikhsan" <ikhsan.and...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> tadi liat twitter ada TT "Hate Android"
>> ternyata asalnya adalah dari artikel ini..
>> http://parislemon.com/post/15604811641/why-i-hate-android
>> jujur bahasanya rada njelimet dan ada hubungannya sama sejarah android yg
>> saya sendiri ga paham.. mungkin ada yg bs ngasih penjelasan soal fakta2 yg
>> disebut di artikel ini?
>>
>>
>> *HATE ANDROID*
>>
>> Why do I hate Android? It’s definitely one of the questions I get asked
>> most often these days. And most of those that don’t ask probably assume
>> it’s because I’m an iPhone guy. People see negative take after negative
>> take about the operating system and label me as “unreasonable” or “biased”
>> or worse.
>>
>> I should probably explain.
>>
>> Believe it or not, I actually don’t hate Android. That is to say, I don’t
>> hate the *concept* of Android — in fact, at one point, I loved it. What
>> I hate is what Android has become. And more specifically, what Google has
>> done with Android.
>>
>> Let’s turn back the clock. In 2006, the mobile landscape in the United
>> States was almost unfathomably shitty. Motorola’s RAZR had been the
>> top-selling device for something ridiculous like five straight years — and
>> the only thing that didn’t suck about it was its physical size. The
>> carriers completely controlled the industry. This cannot be overstated.
>>
>> Then on January 9, 2007 — exactly 5 years ago today — Steve Jobs took the
>> stage at Macworld to unveil the iPhone. Six months later it was released.
>> While some laughed it off <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nXq9NTjEdTo>at the 
>> time, the mobile landscape completely changed.
>>
>> Apple and Google were great allies at the time. They united over a common
>> enemy: Microsoft. Then-Google CEO Eric Schmidt was even on Apple’s board of
>> directors. Google was a huge part of original iPhone OS (before it was
>> called iOS): Google Maps, YouTube, Google Search, etc. Apple could have
>> launched the iPhone without Google, but it wouldn’t have been as good. And
>> if they had to do something like build their own maps from scratch, it
>> would have taken longer.
>>
>> A few months later, on November 5, 2007, Google teamed up with many of
>> the big players in the mobile/telecom space to announce the Open Handset
>> Alliance. At the time it sounded promising, but perhaps it should have been
>> the first warning sign. The first product of this partnership: Android. A
>> beta was released, but it would take almost another year before the
>> software was actually ready to go.
>>
>> The initial Android 
>> prototypes<http://gizmodo.com/334909/google-android-prototype-in-the-wild?tag=gadgetsandroidhardwareinthewild>looked
>>  a lot like BlackBerry devices (both in hardware and software). But
>> the first device (the G1) and OS actually released was more of a cross
>> between a T-Mobile Sidekick (which Android head Andy Rubin helped create
>> while still a co-founder at 
>> Danger<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Danger_%28company%29>)
>> and the iPhone OS.
>>
>> In hindsight, Steve Jobs was clearly not happy about 
>> this<http://www.zdnet.com/blog/btl/steve-jobs-android-a-stolen-product/61504>and
>>  the subsequent iPhone-ification of Android. But great artists steal,
>> etc, etc. The only thing I didn’t like about Android at the time was that
>> it was a *shitty* copy of the iPhone. It was something you couldn’t pay
>> me to use. And most people seemed to feel the same way.
>>
>> Jobs probably didn’t say much at the time because he didn’t have to. The
>> market was saying it.
>>
>> Time went on and it was pretty clear that despite the major players
>> involved in the OHA, Android wasn’t getting a lot of traction. Meanwhile,
>> the iPhone, after a price-cut and addition of 3G technology, was soaring.
>> So Google did the logical thing, they went to see Verizon, the largest U.S.
>> carrier, and struck a 
>> deal<http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33192558/ns/technology_and_science-tech_and_gadgets/t/verizon-google-android-partnership/#.Twuk997uYug>
>> .
>>
>> Remember, Apple still had an agreement with AT&T for exclusive iPhone
>> rights in the U.S. at the time. Verizon and Google needed each other. But
>> Google clearly needed Verizon more. This was the first real problem. A deal
>> with the devil was struck.
>>
>> Let’s back up for a second.
>>
>> Even before Android’s launch, Google clearly had big dreams for the
>> mobile space. “Your mobile phone should be free,” Eric Schmidt 
>> told<http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15700344/>Reuters in late 2006. He 
>> envisioned a world in which consumers didn’t have
>> to pay for their mobile phones — advertising (served by Google, naturally)
>> would subsidize the cost. And we’re not talking “free” with a two-year
>> carrier contract. We’re talking *free* free.
>>
>> In the pre-iPhone world this may have sounded like crazy-talk. But
>> remember, as an Apple board member and having purchased Android for Google
>> in 2005, Schmidt knew what was coming down the pipe. He absolutely intended
>> to disrupt the mobile market.
>>
>> But again, the initial releases of Android simply didn’t have the
>> traction needed to come close to fulfilling Schmidt’s (and Google’s) dream.
>> So deals with the carriers had to be made.
>>
>> Still, Google hung on to the hope of a free phone. That phone was called
>> the Nexus One.
>>
>> At an event in January of 2010, Google unveiled their plan for Nexus One
>> — the first real “Google Phone” as it were. While they were cautious and
>> cagey with some details, the goal seemed clear: Google intended to blow up
>> the carrier market (in the U.S. first) by moving phone distribution online,
>> flattening it in the process. The idea was that you’d go to a website and
>> pick the phone you wanted, then pick the *carrier* you wanted, pay, and
>> you’d be done.
>>
>> Think about this for a second. Instead of going to the store of a single
>> carrier and having a dozen shitty phones shoved in your face by salespeople
>> that made commission, you’d be in total control of the process. The end
>> result of consumers getting to choose their carriers (and phones and plans)
>> was clear: major competition and subsequently a rush of better deals from
>> said carriers to ensure customer activation and retention.
>>
>> Or, you could buy whatever phone you wanted *unlocked*. Eventually,
>> pay-as-you-go SIM cards would pop up in the U.S. as a result.
>>
>> This was to be the dawn of the golden age of mobile in this country. As I
>> wrote at the time: Apple And Google Just Tag Teamed The U.S. 
>> Carriers<http://techcrunch.com/2010/01/05/apple-google-carriers/>.
>> I loved it.
>>
>> But it was never meant to be.
>>
>> What should have been obvious at the time but for whatever reason wasn’t
>> (maybe because carrier representatives were at the event), the carriers
>> hated this plan. And for good reason — it was going to turn them into dumb
>> pipes that competed on price. There was no way they were going to let this
>> fly, and they didn’t. Within a few months, citing weak sales of the Nexus
>> One, Google scrapped their ambitious website and instead got fully in bed
>> with the carriers.
>>
>> But there was more.
>>
>> What no one knew at the time, and I only heard months 
>> later<http://techcrunch.com/2010/09/10/google-nexus-one/>,
>> was Google’s original vision for the Nexus One. Google intended to sell it
>> for $99 without a contract and unlocked. Yes, a $99 unlocked phone,
>> subsidized by Google ads.
>>
>> But the plan had one little problem: Google didn’t operate their own
>> cellular network. They needed Verizon or AT&T or Sprint or T-Mobile to help
>> them out. Google probably thought their open spectrum deal 
>> “win”<http://venturebeat.com/2008/03/20/did-google-trick-verizon-into-spending-billions-for-a-spectrum-auction-win/>in
>>  early 2008 gave them the leverage they needed here. Sadly, it did not.
>>
>> All of the carriers laughed in Google’s face when presented with the
>> ambitious Nexus One plan. And given that Google had just signed the
>> all-important deal with Verizon, it was never going to happen.
>>
>> So instead, at the Nexus One launch we got a website where you could
>> indeed buy an unlocked Android phone — for $529. Nonstarter.
>>
>> Better yet, while they said they were committed at the time, Verizon and
>> Sprint never even got around to supporting the Nexus One *at all*.
>> That’s how much they were behind the project.
>>
>> To complicate matters further, behind the scenes, Verizon and Google were
>> arguing over Net Neutrality rules. Verizon was opposed, Google was in
>> favor. Then a funny thing happened. Google started supporting Verizon’s
>> viewpoint on the matter! If you’re looking for the first post where I’m
>> really, truly, pissed off at Google, look no further.
>>
>> It. Was. Total. Fucking. 
>> Bullshit.<http://techcrunch.com/2010/08/13/google-net-neutrality/>
>>
>> A few months later, guess what happened? Thanks to the Google/Verizon
>> alliance on the matter, the FCC decided the compromised vision of Net
>> Neutrality was just fine 
>> also<http://techcrunch.com/2010/12/21/verizon-google-fcc-net-neutrality/>.
>> To be clear: Net Neutrality was thrown out in the wireless space because
>> Google sided with Verizon’s ridiculous and horribly conflicted stance on
>> the matter.
>>
>> The open spectrum enemy, turned Net Neutrality enemy, became Google’s
>> bedmate thanks to a business deal. Straight up. Greed, for lack of a better
>> word, is good.
>>
>> We got all of this thanks to Google’s desire for Android to take over the
>> world. I commented earlier that they signed a deal with the devil — I
>> wasn’t being facetious. They actually did! And they got away with it!
>>
>> I think about these things everyday that I see positive news about
>> Android. It’s so wonderful that the platform which helped cripple Net
>> Neutrality and is keeping the evil carriers in control is taking off. Make
>> no mistake: Android is now the carriers’ best friend.
>>
>> Because Google sloppily decided to do the Motorola deal (driven by the
>> full-on patent war <http://techcrunch.com/2011/07/09/vesper/>, for which
>> Apple and Microsoft, and not Google, are largely to blame), and because the
>> model isn’t great for all but the biggest 
>> player<http://parislemon.com/post/15418182445/one-out-of-three-aint-bad>,
>> now the OEMs may be our best hope against the carrier/Android alliance.
>>
>> Eventually, many of them will try to do their own thing (perhaps even
>> using Android as a base) because they’re not idiots, they see where the
>> real money is: controlling the entire experience. Like Apple.
>>
>> All of this backstory knowledge fuels my rage. When I see Google talk
>> about how “open” the platform 
>> is<http://techcrunch.com/2010/09/09/android-open/>,
>> setting it up as the foil to the “closed” (and framed as “evil”) iPhone, I
>> want to scream and rip someone’s head off. It’s not only the most extreme
>> example of being disingenuous that I can ever recall seeing — it’s nuclear
>> bullshit.
>>
>> Apple, for all the shit they get for being “closed” and “evil”, has
>> actually done far more to wrestle control back from the carriers and put it
>> into the hands of consumers. Google set off to help in this goal, then
>> stabbed us all in the back and went the complete other way, to the side of
>> the carriers. And because they smiled the entire time they were doing it
>> and fed us this “open” bullshit, we thanked them for it. We’re still
>> thanking them for it!
>>
>> When you think about it in the context of this election season we’re
>> entering, it’s a brilliant political maneuver that Google has pulled off
>> with Android. They’ve taken something they’ve done that’s actually bad for
>> us and spun it in such a way that most people actually buy into it being
>> good for us.
>>
>> And for the carriers, Android is the best thing ever because it’s the new
>> “opiate for the masses <http://parislemon.com/post/15200195253/clopen>”.
>> Everything shitty they’re doing is great because they’re doing it with
>> Android — at least it’s not iOS. What a load of horseshit.
>>
>> I realize that the Android team at Google has a lot of good people doing
>> great work. I know some of them. I respect them. But I cannot respect their
>> decision to continue to work on this platform that perpetuates our
>> imprisonment. I have to believe most simply chose not to think about these
>> things. But they should. They really should.
>>
>> There’s no denying that there are upsides to open — a lot of them. But in
>> the case of Android, “open <http://techcrunch.com/2011/03/26/open/>” has
>> been hijacked and wildly contorted so as to mask the shady side of what’s
>> really been going on. And it’s working.
>>
>> So that, ladies and gentleman, is why I hate Android. It has nothing to
>> do with the actual product (which continues to improve every year and is
>> quite good 
>> now<http://techcrunch.com/2011/12/14/iphone-galaxy-nexus-review/>).
>> It has to do with a promise that was broken and swept under the rug.
>>
>> As crazy as it may sound to some of you, beyond a full OEM revolt (which
>> could ultimately benefit the carriers as well), our hope now lies with
>> Apple and Microsoft.
>>
>> Apple, because they put the consumer first and have proven time and time
>> again that they will not bend to carrier bullshit and will often work
>> against them behind the scenes. And they control the all-important Apple
>> stores for distribution (and, of course, the App Store).
>>
>> Microsoft, because they have a model (many handsets on all carriers) that
>> can potentially scale better than Apple’s can while still giving control
>> (mostly) to the users. And they have Nokia on board with their plan. And
>> they have intersections with products like Xbox. (Though it may be too
>> late in the 
>> U.S.<http://parislemon.com/post/14840209963/the-windows-phone-problem-in-three-words-way-too-late>
>> )
>>
>> Perhaps more people will relate to this: I hate Android for the same
>> reason that Severus Snape hates Harry Potter — the very sight reminds me of
>> something so beautiful, that was taken. Except it’s worse. It’s as if Harry
>> Potter has grown up to become Voldemort.
>>
>>  --
>> "Indonesian Android Community" Join: http://forum.android.or.id
>>
>> ===============
>> Download Aplikasi Kompas versi Digital dan Keren
>> https://market.android.com/details?id=com.kompas.android.kec
>> --------------------------
>> Gunakan Paket Unlimited Data XL Mobile Broadband
>> http://www.xl.co.id/XLInternet/BroadbandInternet
>> --------------------
>> PING'S Mobile - Plaza Semanggi
>> E-mail: i...@pings-mobile.com Ph. 021-25536796
>> --------------------
>> Toko EceranShop - BEC Bandung
>> E-mail: wi...@eceranshop.com Ph. 0815-56599888
>> ===============
>>
>> Aturan Jualan dan Kloteran ID-Android http://goo.gl/YBN21
>>
>  --
> "Indonesian Android Community" Join: http://forum.android.or.id
>
> ===============
> Download Aplikasi Kompas versi Digital dan Keren
> https://market.android.com/details?id=com.kompas.android.kec
> --------------------------
> Gunakan Paket Unlimited Data XL Mobile Broadband
> http://www.xl.co.id/XLInternet/BroadbandInternet
> --------------------
> PING'S Mobile - Plaza Semanggi
> E-mail: i...@pings-mobile.com Ph. 021-25536796
> --------------------
> Toko EceranShop - BEC Bandung
> E-mail: wi...@eceranshop.com Ph. 0815-56599888
> ===============
>
> Aturan Jualan dan Kloteran ID-Android http://goo.gl/YBN21
>

-- 
"Indonesian Android Community"  Join: http://forum.android.or.id

===============
Download Aplikasi Kompas  versi Digital dan Keren
https://market.android.com/details?id=com.kompas.android.kec
--------------------------
Gunakan Paket Unlimited Data XL Mobile Broadband  
http://www.xl.co.id/XLInternet/BroadbandInternet
--------------------
PING'S Mobile - Plaza Semanggi
E-mail: i...@pings-mobile.com Ph. 021-25536796
--------------------
Toko EceranShop - BEC  Bandung
E-mail: wi...@eceranshop.com  Ph. 0815-56599888
===============

Aturan Jualan dan Kloteran ID-Android http://goo.gl/YBN21

Reply via email to