Senasib dgn saya, kemarin sempat coba jg, force close di Mi5 rom miuipro. On Oct 15, 2017 4:30 PM, "Handoko Santoso" <mailist.atlan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Om Eko, > > Saya coba di Mi Mix 256GB Snapdragon 821 pakai China Dev ROM Miui 9 tidak > bisa, selalu force close 😊. > > Thanks > > > > > > Sent from my Mi phone > On Eko Prasetiyo <ekopraset...@gmail.com>, Oct 15, 2017 11:22 AM wrote: > > > > ---- > How Google Camera HDR+ Improves the Image Quality of Xiaomi Budget Phones > // xda-developers > https://www.xda-developers.com/google-camera-hdr-xiaomi-redmi-note-3/ > > Xiaomi is currently the second largest smartphone manufacturer in India, > and for good reason. Consistently, the manufacturer has posted > class-leading performance and display quality at an exceptional value for > its price. One thing, however, that Xiaomi hasn’t yet been able to nail is > the camera performance of their budget smartphones. Thankfully, we now > have the Google Camera HDR+ port. > > The Redmi Note 3, released in 2016, started a trend of underperforming > camera quality in Xiaomi phones. It excelled in almost everything else, but > had unfortunately only average image quality. The Redmi 3S and the Mi Max > released later that year didn’t do much to improve things. Even the > flagship Mi 5 couldn’t compete with the camera of the OnePlus 3, although > the camera specifications of both phones were almost the same. Other > competitors at the same price point had weaker specifications but were able > to boast better camera performance. > > A Troubled Camera > > Despite Xiaomi’s meteoric rise in popularity in the Indian smartphone > market in 2017, things haven’t changed on this front. Camera quality still > hasn’t been a priority for Xiaomi for most of this year, but this situation > is slowly beginning to change with the release of camera-centric mid-range > smartphones such as the Mi A1 – which we should note lacks any form of > video stabilization. > > The Redmi Note 4, the Redmi 4, and the Mi Max 2 all had relatively poor > image quality despite having fairly decent camera specifications. The Redmi > Note 4, for example, has a 13MP ⅓-inch Sony IMX258 sensor with a f/2.0 lens > and 1.1 micron pixels. > > It’s interesting to note that the camera sensor used is the same one found > in the LG G6. Of course, the G6 has a superior f/1.8 lens, superior ISP > (aided by the Snapdragon 821’s Hexagon DSP), and optical image > stabilization but the difference between the image quality of the Redmi > Note 4 and the G6 is too vast to be explained purely by these factors. The > key ingredient missing here is image processing. > > While LG didn’t have best-in-class image processing with the G6, it’s > still several orders of magnitude better than what Xiaomi offers with the > Redmi Note 4. The Redmi Note 4’s photos are overly soft even in daylight > and detail preservation is poor, leading to the oil painting effect. The > smudging is harsh and it manages to destroy detail without addressing the > noise. > > In low light, there is no comparison because the Redmi Note 4 (as well as > the Redmi 4, and to a lesser extent, the Mi Max 2) falls apart in low light > conditions. The photos taken in low light, both in outdoor and indoor > scenarios, are incredibly dark, noisy, and lack fine detail. Once again, > this shouldn’t be the case as other OEMs have made better use of the same > camera sensors. > > Xiaomi recommends using the HHT (Hand Held Twilight) mode in low light, > which does produce better results as it uses image stacking. However, the > photos still turn out to be poor in even moderate lighting indoors. To give > an example, the LG G3 from 2014 has a much older sensor (the 13MP IMX135), > yet manages to take better photos with much more detail in both daylight > and low light conditions thanks to exposure combining and use of long > exposures (made possible because of its Optical Image Stabilization). > > While there may be light at the end of the tunnel for Xiaomi users with > the release of phones such as the Xiaomi Mi A1, this doesn’t help Redmi > users who have bought a Redmi device in 2016 or 2017. Even in the case of > the Mi A1, its low light photos are markedly improved from the Redmi Note > 4, but it still isn’t competitive with older flagships and most importantly > its newer competitors. > > Google Camera HDR+ Port > > So what are we to do? Here is where the unofficial port of the Google > Camera app, complete with Google’s HDR+ technology, comes to the rescue. An > explanation of what HDR+ means and the workflow it consists of can be found > here. To put it simply, Google’s HDR+ algorithm is one of the primary > reasons why the camera of the Google Pixel is rated so highly. It uses > computational photography and image stacking to make up hardware deficits > elsewhere (such as the lack of OIS) and preserves detail with luminance > noise instead of destroying it. > > Suggested reading: Google Camera HDR+ Port Updated with RAW Support, HDR > Customization > > Multiple versions of the Google Camera port are available, but I recommend > you use this one which is fully point-and-shoot and doesn’t require > fiddling with settings to set up the HDR+ algorithm. Xiaomi devices require > the Camera2 API to be manually enabled with a build.prop edit – thus root > is required to use this port on Xiaomi phones. So yes, you should root your > Xiaomi device if you haven’t done so already. > > The Google Camera HDR+ port works without needing additional modifications > on AOSP-based custom ROMs such as LineageOS – no need to edit the > build.prop. > > MIUI Camera App vs. Google Camera Port > > In order to test differences in image quality, I tried out a comparison > between the Google Camera HDR+ port installed on a Redmi Note 3 running > official LineageOS 14.1 and the stock MIUI camera app installed on a Redmi > Note 4 running the stock MIUI 8.5 Global ROM. > > Normally, in a stock-vs-stock camera comparison, the Redmi Note 4 is > expected to win considering it has a better camera than the Redmi Note 3. > The megapixel count is lower, but 16MP on such a small sensor was of > limited use, and hence the pixel size is bigger (1.1 micron vs. 1.0 micron). > > Here, however, Google Camera’s software HDR+ changes the game entirely. > While HDR+ on these budget devices doesn’t work as well as it does on a > OnePlus 3T, it’s still quite effective in many cases. Take a look at the > following image samples: > > The Redmi Note 3’s image quality is dramatically improved by using HDR+ > auto (the default setting) on the Google Camera port. In daylight, > sharpness is better and detail is marginally improved. As these samples > have the HDR+ auto setting enabled, the poor dynamic range of the camera is > mitigated quite a bit to the point where you can actually take a usable > back-lit photo. Color detail is also superb with HDR+ with colours being > true-to-life and accurately depicted instead of appearing undersaturated. > > The price to pay for this improvement in image quality is the capturing > and processing speed. It takes longer to snap photos in the Google Camera > app compared to the stock MIUI camera which is basically instant. There is > also substantial processing lag in the order of seconds – you have to wait > 5-10 seconds for the processing to take place. (In fairness to the Note 3, > the processing delay also exists on Snapdragon 820 devices and is even > found on the Pixel). > > The Redmi Note 4’s camera quality proves equivalent or even inferior to > the Redmi Note 3 using Google Camera HDR+. In daylight, the Redmi Note 4 > has many of the same issues which have plagued other Xiaomi budget devices > in the past-namely poor dynamic range-which means it’s difficult to take a > photo and have a properly exposed sky. This basically means that you have > to leave HDR enabled all the time in daylight as there is still no auto HDR > toggle in the MIUI camera app. > > Detail is also poor, and the detail captured isn’t representative of the > true detail a 13MP camera could capture. It’s on par with the Redmi Note 3 > Google Camera samples here, but we’ve seen better elsewhere. > > The foliage has this characteristic smudged, soft Xiaomi processing look. > HDR processing – which does mitigate the dynamic range issue – requires the > phone to be held steady as it takes 2+ seconds to process the image. > > In low light, we would expect the Redmi Note 4 to win by a substantial > margin because of its bigger pixels, but it ends up being a close contest. > The Redmi Note 3 with the MIUI camera app has below average low light image > quality, which could be slightly improved using HHT mode. The Google Camera > port, however, unlocks the full potential of its abilities. > > With the Redmi Note 3 using Google Camera, detail is mostly similar in the > two phones. Color detail is very poor on the Redmi Note 4, to the point > that all colors are undersaturated, compounded by the lack of contrast in > photos. HDR+ proves its worth again by having much superior colour detail > in low light in the Redmi Note 3 samples. Also, dynamic range is once again > better in the Redmi Note 3. The plus points for the Redmi Note 4? It has > better sharpness in low light conditions and it can take photos more > quickly. > > An Improved Redmi Note 3 Camera Experience > > In conclusion, the Redmi Note 4 has better camera hardware, but because of > HDR+ in the Google Camera app, the Redmi Note 3 can take equally as good or > even better photos than the Redmi Note 4. The Redmi Note 4 will likely > regain its camera advantage after installing Google Camera, but when it > comes to the MIUI camera app vs. Google Camera, the latter is the clear > victor. As such, users with Xiaomi’s budget smartphones should consider > installing this camera port as soon as possible if they want to unlock the > true potential of their smartphone camera. If you want to learn more, check > out our article explaining the Google Camera HDR+ port! > > Download Google Camera Port Optimized for Snapdragon 820/821 devices > > Download Google Camera Port with HDR+, ZSL, and RAW Capture > > > ---- > > Read in my feedly.com > > -- > =========== > Install #MyTelkomsel Apps Terbaru dari Play Store > https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.telkomsel.telkomselcm > > ---------------------- > Kontak Admin, Twitter @agushamonangan > ----------------------- > FB Groups : https://www.facebook.com/groups/android.or.id > > Aturan Umum ID-ANDROID >> goo.gl/mL1mBT > > ========== > --- > Anda menerima pesan ini karena berlangganan grup "[id-android] Indonesian > Android Community" di Google Grup. > Untuk berhenti berlangganan dan berhenti menerima email dari grup ini, > kirim email ke id-android+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > Kunjungi grup ini di https://groups.google.com/group/id-android. > > -- > =========== > Install #MyTelkomsel Apps Terbaru dari Play Store > https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.telkomsel.telkomselcm > > ---------------------- > Kontak Admin, Twitter @agushamonangan > ----------------------- > FB Groups : https://www.facebook.com/groups/android.or.id > > Aturan Umum ID-ANDROID >> goo.gl/mL1mBT > > ========== > --- > Anda menerima pesan ini karena berlangganan grup "[id-android] Indonesian > Android Community" di Google Grup. > Untuk berhenti berlangganan dan berhenti menerima email dari grup ini, > kirim email ke id-android+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > Kunjungi grup ini di https://groups.google.com/group/id-android. > -- =========== Install #MyTelkomsel Apps Terbaru dari Play Store https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.telkomsel.telkomselcm ---------------------- Kontak Admin, Twitter @agushamonangan ----------------------- FB Groups : https://www.facebook.com/groups/android.or.id Aturan Umum ID-ANDROID >> goo.gl/mL1mBT ========== --- Anda menerima pesan ini karena Anda berlangganan grup "[id-android] Indonesian Android Community" dari Google Grup. Untuk berhenti berlangganan dan berhenti menerima email dari grup ini, kirim email ke id-android+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. Kunjungi grup ini di https://groups.google.com/group/id-android.