On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 4:07 AM, Roger Serwy <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 06/12/2012 06:45 AM, Beni Cherniavsky-Paskin wrote: > >> I'd say unsaved source is rare case; the more precious thing lost is the >> shell window - commands history and outputs. >> This is a problem both when you have kill IDLE itself because the >> executed code is stuck, >> and when you just want ensure a clean run - without Restart Shell >> functionality, you have to close and reopen IDLE, again losing shell history >> (one could remember to always Save As the shell window, but there's no >> convenient way to load it inside IDLE). >> >> When you say shell history, do you mean IdleHistory.py's History object > or the contents of the shell window? Both. > > I have written an extension to automatically save and restore the History > object for IDLE, as part of IdleX. > > Nice. Even with it, the experience in single-process mode would be annoying. Anyway, the question is not so much whether one can be happy with the single-process mode, but whether anybody is unable to use subprocess mode.
_______________________________________________ IDLE-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/idle-dev
