>> But one example of being fair is that
>> if 63 characters are allowed using ASCII, 63 characters must also be
>> allowed using ISO 8859-1 (or other latinbased character sets).
>> When we use UTF-8, the protocol will have space for more ASCII characters
>> than ISO 8859-1 characters. To be fair, ASCII must still be restricted
>> to 63 characters even if the protocol have space for more.
>> This restriction is also very important for implementors.
This proposal would completely hose languages with lots
of diacritical marks present on a single "letter", such as Vietnamese.
So I object strenuously.
Ran
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- [idn] Unicode tagging Edmon
- Re: [idn] Unicode tagging RJ Atkinson
- Re: [idn] Unicode tagging Paul Hoffman / IMC
- Re: [idn] Unicode tagging Keith Moore
- Re: [idn] Unicode tagging Dan Oscarsson
- Re: [idn] Unicode tagging Keith Moore
- Re: [idn] Unicode tagging RJ Atkinson
- Re: [idn] Unicode tagging Keith Moore
- Re: [idn] Unicode tagging RJ Atkinson
- [idn] Unicode tagging Edmon
- Re: [idn] Unicode tagging Edmon
- Re: [idn] Unicode tagging Keith Moore
- Re: [idn] Unicode tagging Edmon
- Re: [idn] Unicode tagging RJ Atkinson
- Re: [idn] Unicode tagging James Seng
- Re: [idn] Unicode tagging RJ Atkinson
- Re: [idn] Unicode tagging Paul Hoffman / IMC
