Three extracts (I should use multipart mime...) and my comment below:
===============
>Martin Duerst wrote:
>
> > At 17:46 01/07/12 +0000, Adam M. Costello wrote:
> >> I didn't really understand until this morning that any proposal that
> >> doesn't have seven supporters by tomorrow will be out of the running.
>
> > Just for the record: If anybody is working on a UTF-8 based
> > (or even ACE/UTF-8 mixed) solution, they herewith all have
> > my support (I won't tell them one-by-one).
====================
At/� 11:06 2001-07-16 -0700, Russ Rolfe you wrote/vous �criviez:
>I know this is late, but was unable to reply until now. UTF-8 based
>solutions also have my support.
==============================
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 14:27:52 -0400 (EDT)
From: *click* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: idn working group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc: Russ Rolfe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Martin Duerst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: [idn] pool deadline imminent
Better late then never...
I am in support of any UTF-8 based solution and am willing to help
contribute if anyone is working on such a draft.
-Bill
==============================
==============================
To me, this is ambiguous support. I could write a personal internet-draft
that will use electricity to distribute labels over an optical vpn using
BGP extensions and a diffie-hellman exchange that uses UTF-8 for idn. Are
you going to support and implement it?
To Martin, Russ, Bill (and others), please indicate a specific draft (or
drafts) you are supporting. And not to the mailing list but to the authors
(this will save wg mailing list bandwidth).
Marc.
>Regards, Russ Rolfe
>Microsoft -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Martin Duerst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2001 7:49 PM
>To: idn working group
>Subject: Re: [idn] pool deadline imminent
>
>
>At 17:46 01/07/12 +0000, Adam M. Costello wrote:
> >I didn't really understand until this morning that any proposal that
> >doesn't have seven supporters by tomorrow will be out of the running.
>
>Just for the record: If anybody is working on a UTF-8 based
>(or even ACE/UTF-8 mixed) solution, they herewith all have
>my support (I won't tell them one-by-one).
>
>Regards, Martin.
