On Thu, 19 Jul 2001, Patrik F�ltstr�m wrote: > As evidence that you are completely wrong I take Hotmail as an example. I agree. Whatever experience I have tells me that a lot of companies won't bother with internationalization. They will upgrade for security reasons but as we know, recently discovered vulnerabilities usually only affect newer versions. (E g, recent exploits have been for BIND 8 while a lot of people still run BIND 4.) I'd just like to point out that scenarios like this is one of the arguments a number of people have tried to present in support of UTF-8. Software vendors won't test their products enough or prioritize fixing problems which is why we'll most likely get problems with "leakage" of ACE. And that's precisely the reason why we need to move toward the Single Encoding in all protocols... /Magnus
- Re: [idn] Debunking the ACE myth Keith Moore
- Re: [idn] Debunking the ACE myth Keith Moore
- Re: [idn] Debunking the ACE myth Eric A. Hall
- Re: [idn] Debunking the ACE myth Eric A. Hall
- Re: [idn] Debunking the ACE myth Keith Moore
- Re: [idn] Debunking the ACE myth Eric A. Hall
- Re: [idn] Debunking the ACE myth Patrik F�ltstr�m
- Re: [idn] Debunking the ACE myth David Hopwood
- Re: [idn] Debunking the ACE myth Keith Moore
- Re: [idn] Debunking the ACE myth David Hopwood
- Re: [idn] Debunking the ACE myth C C Magnus Gustavsson
- Re: [idn] Debunking the ACE myth Paul Hoffman / IMC
- Re: [idn] Debunking the ACE myth Adam M. Costello
- Re: [idn] Debunking the ACE myth Eric A. Hall
- Re: [idn] Debunking the ACE myth ned . freed
- Re: [idn] Debunking the ACE myth David Hopwood
- Re: [idn] Debunking the ACE myth Martin Duerst
- Re: [idn] Debunking the ACE myth Martin Duerst
- RE: [idn] Debunking the ACE myth Martin Duerst
- Re: [idn] Debunking the ACE myth Eric A. Hall
- Re: [idn] Debunking the ACE myth Patrik F�ltstr�m
