Re: [idn] opting out of SC/TC equivalence

[Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine]

In a previous note I commented on the scaling issue I understand this form
of [30] (registrant assigned equivalence rules, vs zone manager assigned
equivalence rules, in obsoleted versions of the requirements draft) to pose.
Insight into proposed mechanism and its scaling properties would be of real
interest.

I also suggested to the earlier proponent of this form of [30] that s/he
attempt to state a variation of [30] that would express his or her, and now
your, desired policy.

Eric