I will mention also http://www.unicode.org/roadmaps/, which shows the future planned allocations.
Mark ————— Δός μοι ποῦ στῶ, καὶ κινῶ τὴν γῆν — Ἀρχιμήδης [http://www.macchiato.com] ----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 23:08 Subject: Re: [idn] REORDERING: stability issues and UTC solutions > In a message dated 2001-10-22 8:41:07 Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > writes: > > > Instead of NFC, some script may need CASE mappings, i guess. > > Current nameprep/ACE produce case-insensitively equivalent labels > > for IDN X.com and x.com. > > Do you mean that all newly added SCRIPT won't have any case mapping ? > > Of course there will be new scripts added to Unicode/10646 that have case > mappings (although those proposed for Unicode 3.2 do not). But I thought we > were talking about reordering, not case mappings. I fear, once again, that > the subject is being changed to divert us from the real issues surrounding > the reordering proposal. > > > Doug, > > If you have lists of new scripts pending for approval, > > please post them to this list for non-unicode experts. > > See <http://www.unicode.org/pending/pending.html>. This location always has > the most up-to-date list of proposed scripts, along with an indication of how > far along the "pending" path they are. > > -Doug Ewell > Fullerton, California > >
