[Sorry, sent before being done.] > > >>LEGACY: the source characters are *only* intended to be used for > > >> round-trip mappings from legacy charsets. > > > > > >I do not understand what you want to do with those. > > >Do you suggest outlawing this category? > > > > Yes. IDN is a new system, with the goal of being able to > > represent labels in a wide range of scripts. There is no > > need to allow artefacts of legacy character encodings, > > because IDN isn't designed to map existing names back > > and forth from other naming systems. > > So you do not think it is realistic, for example, to have a > document encoded in KS C 5601, containing domain names where > the labels would be written using non conjoining Jamo. >
[Edit] Is that because nobody uses these anymore, and so you would not expect a modern invention like IDN to appear in an anachronic way? Is that the case with all LEGACY characters? > YA >
