fyi

----- Original Message -----
From: "Harald Alvestrand" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2001 7:00 PM
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] is broken


> This was an error at the Secretariat.
>
> The Secretariat has a log of the approx. 40 email addresses that got a
> bounce message, and is working to make sure those drafts get
published.
>
> This may mean that you will get an email requesting you to send your
draft
> again, unfortunately.
>
>                             Harald
>
>
> --On onsdag, november 21, 2001 14:10:08 -0800 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > This afternoon I submitted a revised draft to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > before the 2pm ET deadline and got the following autoreply:
> >
> > From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 21 13:30:56 2001
> > Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 16:30:49 -0500 (EST)
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: draft-ietf-pilc-link-design-08.txt
> > X-URL: http://www.ietf.org/
> > Subject: Autoreply from Internet Draft Submission Manager
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Internet Draft Submission Manager)
> >
> > Greetings,
> >
> > We are sorry, but the cut-off for Internet-Draft submissions was
Wednesday
> > November 21, 2001 at 5pm ET. Your submission will not be retained
(i.e.
> > you need to resubmit) after December 9, 2001.
> >
> > If you receive this announcement, your submission will NOT be
processed.
> >
> > (end of excerpt)
> >
> > Note that the timestamp on the autoreply is a full half-hour before
the
> > deadline. Something is broken. Who do I complain to?
> >
> > Phil
> >
> > -
> > This message was passed through [EMAIL PROTECTED],
which
> > is a sublist of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Not all messages are passed.
> > Decisions on what to pass are made solely by Raffaele D'Albenzio.
> >
>
>


Reply via email to