-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- David Hopwood wrote: > There are several ways of solving all the problems simultaneously: > > a) NFC o fold o NFC.
I should clarify that the functions I'm referring to here in a)-f) are alternatives for the function that is used by applications to test equivalence of valid encoded names. In the case of g), unnormalised names are not valid, so it is sufficient to use ASCII case folding to test equivalence. > b) foldafter o NFC o foldbefore, where foldafter handles only <dotted-I> > and <ypogegrammeni> and foldbefore handles the rest. Actually a) and b) define the same function, so they should be considered as a single alternative; call it ab). - -- David Hopwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home page & PGP public key: http://www.users.zetnet.co.uk/hopwood/ RSA 2048-bit; fingerprint 71 8E A6 23 0E D3 4C E5 0F 69 8C D4 FA 66 15 01 Nothing in this message is intended to be legally binding. If I revoke a public key but refuse to specify why, it is because the private key has been seized under the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act; see www.fipr.org/rip -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.3i Charset: noconv iQEVAwUBPANvCDkCAxeYt5gVAQEeewf+OLKVHCyohNOnyWqCxYmkw7dznDZBUS0z LwlJPD5krBIx/YjAfZSFwUfZfUDFBMnsw9Ln5/BvtFxYkatmBdxG7Y9bBjYYJ0q2 r8psHjsU6Qco8ka9799tcHzB2yBc+q2QJxC5+9Lbjaak4LliozI8BZuDha/977P3 DrBiR8TQBjFAZ+Udyk5LIE5ancGo3YxF6bBN9Lqutq38W/aNGNVW52TOpaGhmwIz dpXRtB5ajcDw+TSaojQwpIb8ga0B+vlbM71ZXwVZLgkwa5TaWUVbs5avUrEcaQ4g OPgS5ZMnOutQBlRJfvVIx+A0nFAYBCd5dGDkFwE2BcYE2DUrWkSRvg== =SZEN -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
